可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 32913300

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner submitted letters and certificates related to his company's involvement in various projects but never identified this as a criterion being claimed; no analysis was performed.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted letters and certificates related to his company's involvement in various projects but never identified this as a criterion being claimed; no analysis was performed.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_03_B2203; source_row=40033
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner submitted an invitation to participate as a member of a competition commission but never identified this as a criterion being claimed; no analysis was performed.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted an invitation to participate as a member of a competition commission but never identified this as a criterion being claimed; no analysis was performed.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_03_B2203; source_row=40032
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

环境 / 能源

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found the proposed endeavor was insufficiently defined — consisting of a multi-step plan involving private employment, networking, a Ph.D., and eventual government work — and that the Petitioner provided no corroborating evidence to show what his work would entail, how it would have broader implications for the sustainability field, or what substantial positive economic effects would result.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found the proposed endeavor was insufficiently defined — consisting of a multi-step plan involving private employment, networking, a Ph.D., and eventual government work — and that the Petitioner provided no corroborating evidence to show what his work would entail, how it would have broader implications for the sustainability field, or what substantial positive economic effects would result.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_02_B5203; source_row=40027
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWten years experience已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience in the occupation

证据为何得到认可

AAO notes the Director credited this criterion and it was not contested on appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO notes the Director credited this criterion and it was not contested on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_04_B5203; source_row=40045
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

academic record

academic record relating to area of exceptional ability

AAO 为什么未被说服

The transcript shows the substantive coursework relates to aeronautics, not manufacturing, and neither the Petitioner nor the expert opinion specifically explains how the coursework directly relates to manufacturing.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The transcript shows the substantive coursework relates to aeronautics, not manufacturing, and neither the Petitioner nor the expert opinion specifically explains how the coursework directly relates to manufacturing.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_04_B5203; source_row=40044
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

license or certification

license to practice the profession or certification

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agrees the record does not establish that a license or certification is required to practice as a general and operations manager in the manufacturing industry.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the record does not establish that a license or certification is required to practice as a general and operations manager in the manufacturing industry.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_04_B5203; source_row=40046
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 高薪酬已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability

证据为何得到认可

Salary criterion was credited by the Director and not contested on appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Salary criterion was credited by the Director and not contested on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_04_B5203; source_row=40047
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agrees the Petitioner failed to provide metrics or independent evidence showing impact beyond his employers and their specific projects at a level indicative of significant contributions to the field.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the Petitioner failed to provide metrics or independent evidence showing impact beyond his employers and their specific projects at a level indicative of significant contributions to the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_04_B5203; source_row=40049
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他900 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner authored peer-reviewed research papers, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion, as both the Director and AAO agreed.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner authored peer-reviewed research papers, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion, as both the Director and AAO agreed.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_01_B2203; source_row=40017
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他900 次引用

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner submitted evidence of original contributions of major significance in his field, which the Director found sufficient and AAO affirmed.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted evidence of original contributions of major significance in his field, which the Director found sufficient and AAO affirmed.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-16_01_B2203; source_row=40016
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评