Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed the Petitioner's documents show his work and education in IT but do not establish recognition for significant contributions to the IT industry or field by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations. The Petitioner did not specifically address this criterion on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner's documents show his work and education in IT but do not establish recognition for significant contributions to the IT industry or field by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations. The Petitioner did not specifically address this criterion on appeal.
Ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's misstatement of the legal standard but independently found the criterion unmet because the Petitioner did not submit the required letters from current or former employers showing at least ten years of full-time experience, and none of the evidence confirmed full-time employment or employment as a CEO.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's misstatement of the legal standard but independently found the criterion unmet because the Petitioner did not submit the required letters from current or former employers showing at least ten years of full-time experience, and none of the evidence confirmed full-time employment or employment as a CEO.
AAO finds that detailed evidence — including a letter from Turkey's president of Cinema and Broadcasting Union and corroborating media articles — establishes the significant impact of the Petitioner's efforts to create a more equitable working environment in her field through union and legislative advocacy.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO finds that detailed evidence — including a letter from Turkey's president of Cinema and Broadcasting Union and corroborating media articles — establishes the significant impact of the Petitioner's efforts to create a more equitable working environment in her field through union and legislative advocacy.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
裁决如何说明
AAO does not resolve this criterion but instructs the Director on remand to fully evaluate the awards evidence as part of a final merits analysis, criticizing the Director's lack of explanation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not resolve this criterion but instructs the Director on remand to fully evaluate the awards evidence as part of a final merits analysis, criticizing the Director's lack of explanation.
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
证据为何得到认可
AAO holds the criterion's plain language does not require the organization to have received awards, and finds substantive evidence of a distinguished advertising agency's reputation and the Petitioner's leading roles, including detailed letters describing successful award-winning campaigns produced under her direction.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO holds the criterion's plain language does not require the organization to have received awards, and finds substantive evidence of a distinguished advertising agency's reputation and the Petitioner's leading roles, including detailed letters describing successful award-winning campaigns produced under her direction.