AAO declined to reach this prong on the merits because the Director's analysis was based on evidence not in the record, requiring remand for a new decision.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this prong on the merits because the Director's analysis was based on evidence not in the record, requiring remand for a new decision.
AAO reserved opinion on the second prong because the first prong was not met, making a finding on the second prong unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved opinion on the second prong because the first prong was not met, making a finding on the second prong unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Beneficiary failed to meet the threshold evidentiary requirement of three criteria, but nonetheless noted the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Beneficiary failed to meet the threshold evidentiary requirement of three criteria, but nonetheless noted the aggregate record does not establish the required acclaim.
AAO expressly reserved this criterion because the Beneficiary cannot fulfill the minimum evidentiary requirement of three criteria regardless, making the issue unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
为什么值得参考
区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly reserved this criterion because the Beneficiary cannot fulfill the minimum evidentiary requirement of three criteria regardless, making the issue unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
AAO expressly reserved review of the Director's favorable determination for this criterion because the Beneficiary could not fulfill the minimum evidentiary requirement of three criteria regardless.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly reserved review of the Director's favorable determination for this criterion because the Beneficiary could not fulfill the minimum evidentiary requirement of three criteria regardless.
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim
裁决如何说明
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, but observed in dicta that the record did not establish the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidentiary threshold, but observed in dicta that the record did not establish the required acclaim.