display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
裁决如何说明
AAO declined to reach this criterion because it was raised for the first time on appeal, so the Director could not have erred with respect to it, and in any event discussion of it would not change the outcome given the Petitioner had not met at least two other criteria.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because it was raised for the first time on appeal, so the Director could not have erred with respect to it, and in any event discussion of it would not change the outcome given the Petitioner had not met at least two other criteria.
AAO found the Petitioner's argument misstates the eligibility criteria, as meeting three criteria is necessary but not sufficient. The letters relate to steel production rather than auto repair entrepreneurship, and the Petitioner did not provide business records demonstrating solvency or substantial contributions to automotive repair entrepreneurialism.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's argument misstates the eligibility criteria, as meeting three criteria is necessary but not sufficient. The letters relate to steel production rather than auto repair entrepreneurship, and the Petitioner did not provide business records demonstrating solvency or substantial contributions to automotive repair entrepreneurialism.
ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner only accounted for work experience from 2015 onward and therefore did not have ten years of experience in his field at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner only accounted for work experience from 2015 onward and therefore did not have ten years of experience in his field at the time of filing.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters discuss the Petitioner's work as a thermal control operator in steel production, not automotive repair. The Petitioner did not articulate how they reflect significant contributions to automotive repair entrepreneurialism, and provided no evidence from government entities or professional organizations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters discuss the Petitioner's work as a thermal control operator in steel production, not automotive repair. The Petitioner did not articulate how they reflect significant contributions to automotive repair entrepreneurialism, and provided no evidence from government entities or professional organizations.
ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The submitted letter showed work as a Sales Representative, not in the occupation sought (Chief Executive Officer), so it does not establish ten years of full-time experience in the relevant occupation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The submitted letter showed work as a Sales Representative, not in the occupation sought (Chief Executive Officer), so it does not establish ten years of full-time experience in the relevant occupation.