可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 35513560

NIWNIW · 国家重要性保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to make a finding but observed the Director misidentified the endeavor and failed to consider the actual evidence (expert letter, business plan) addressing the trucking endeavor's national importance.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to make a finding but observed the Director misidentified the endeavor and failed to consider the actual evidence (expert letter, business plan) addressing the trucking endeavor's national importance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_02_B5203; source_row=39631
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO criticized the Director for not explaining what evidence was considered in reaching the third-prong determination.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO criticized the Director for not explaining what evidence was considered in reaching the third-prong determination.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_02_B5203; source_row=39633
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong 3 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong 3 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_05_B5203; source_row=39645
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach prong 2 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach prong 2 because the Petitioner failed to satisfy prong 1.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_05_B5203; source_row=39644
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved judgment on prong three because the failure on prong one was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved judgment on prong three because the failure on prong one was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_09_B5203; source_row=39655
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved judgment on prong two because the failure on prong one was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved judgment on prong two because the failure on prong one was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_09_B5203; source_row=39654
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the second prong because the first prong was not met and reaching the second prong was unnecessary to the ultimate decision.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the second prong because the first prong was not met and reaching the second prong was unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_03_B5203; source_row=39635
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer and labor certification requirements

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the third prong because the first prong was not met and reaching the third prong was unnecessary to the ultimate decision.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the third prong because the first prong was not met and reaching the third prong was unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_03_B5203; source_row=39636
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

recognition

Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field by peers, government entities, or professional or business organizations

AAO 为什么未被说服

Both reference letters describe the Petitioner as a valued employee who made positive contributions to his employer and customers, but do not show recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the broader industry or field of computer systems.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Both reference letters describe the Petitioner as a valued employee who made positive contributions to his employer and customers, but do not show recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the broader industry or field of computer systems.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_04_B5203; source_row=39642
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

academic record

Official academic record showing degree, diploma, certificate, or similar award

AAO 为什么未被说服

Certificates completed after the April 28, 2021 filing date could not be considered. The pre-filing certificates—four days of instruction in 2008 and 24 hours in 2020—do not rise to the level of a diploma or degree, and there is no evidence they are official academic records from an accredited institution.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Certificates completed after the April 28, 2021 filing date could not be considered. The pre-filing certificates—four days of instruction in 2008 and 24 hours in 2020—do not rise to the level of a diploma or degree, and there is no evidence they are official academic records from an accredited institution.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-08-05_04_B5203; source_row=39637
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评