The AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong, reserving the issue because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on the first prong failure, and evaluating the second prong would not change the outcome.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong, reserving the issue because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on the first prong failure, and evaluating the second prong would not change the outcome.
on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
The AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong for the same reason as the second prong — the Petitioner's ineligibility under the first prong was dispositive.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong for the same reason as the second prong — the Petitioner's ineligibility under the first prong was dispositive.
AAO explicitly reserved the second prong in the prior decision because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making the second prong unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved the second prong in the prior decision because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making the second prong unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO explicitly reserved the third prong in the prior decision because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making the third prong unnecessary to the ultimate decision.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved the third prong in the prior decision because the Petitioner failed to establish the first prong, making the third prong unnecessary to the ultimate decision.