AAO does not separately reach this criterion at step 1, electing to evaluate the awards evidence as part of the final merits determination since three criteria were already met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO does not separately reach this criterion at step 1, electing to evaluate the awards evidence as part of the final merits determination since three criteria were already met.
AAO agreed that the Petitioner had substantial merit but found she failed to establish national importance. The submitted articles addressed cloud computing and cybersecurity generally but did not discuss the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner had substantial merit but found she failed to establish national importance. The submitted articles addressed cloud computing and cybersecurity generally but did not discuss the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor. Letters of recommendation praised her qualifications but did not demonstrate that her work would extend beyond individual employers to have broader national or global implications for her field.
AAO found the record lacked adequate corroborating evidence that the Petitioner's marketing services business would have broader implications in his field or substantial positive economic effects at a national level.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record lacked adequate corroborating evidence that the Petitioner's marketing services business would have broader implications in his field or substantial positive economic effects at a national level. The economic projections (RIMS II, business plan) were insufficiently detailed and unsupported, and the Petitioner conflated the importance of the marketing industry generally with the national importance of his specific proposed endeavor.
AAO concluded that geographic reach does not equate to national importance; the consulting services are individualized to specific clients and the Petitioner failed to show how innovations would be disseminated more broadly or that indirect economic effects would substantially impact the regional or national economy.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded that geographic reach does not equate to national importance; the consulting services are individualized to specific clients and the Petitioner failed to show how innovations would be disseminated more broadly or that indirect economic effects would substantially impact the regional or national economy.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed that LARAS membership requirements are based on volume of recordings and distributions, not outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner's argument that meeting these requirements is itself a feat was unsubstantiated. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to show that LARAS uses nationally or internationally recognized experts to judge outstanding achievements of prospective members.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that LARAS membership requirements are based on volume of recordings and distributions, not outstanding achievements, and the Petitioner's argument that meeting these requirements is itself a feat was unsubstantiated. Additionally, the Petitioner failed to show that LARAS uses nationally or internationally recognized experts to judge outstanding achievements of prospective members.
AAO concluded the business plan's financial projections were unsupported and contained discrepancies (e.g., projecting $60,000 total for five project managers earning $60,000 each), and that the cultural ripple effects of the body-positive movement did not extend beyond a narrow area to constitute national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the business plan's financial projections were unsupported and contained discrepancies (e.g., projecting $60,000 total for five project managers earning $60,000 each), and that the cultural ripple effects of the body-positive movement did not extend beyond a narrow area to constitute national importance.