license or certification for the profession or occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was not met because the record does not demonstrate a license or certification is required for the Petitioner's profession or occupation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was not met because the record does not demonstrate a license or certification is required for the Petitioner's profession or occupation.
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, finding that the submitted evidence reflects work experience beginning only in June 2014, only six years prior to the September 2020 petition filing date, which does not satisfy the ten-year requirement.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, finding that the submitted evidence reflects work experience beginning only in June 2014, only six years prior to the September 2020 petition filing date, which does not satisfy the ten-year requirement.
academic degree relating to area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's martial arts certificates were not earned from a college, university, school, or other institution of learning as required by the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's martial arts certificates were not earned from a college, university, school, or other institution of learning as required by the criterion.
AAO concluded the projected direct/indirect jobs (4-31 direct, up to 47 indirect) and revenue/tax figures were not significant relative to a franchising industry contributing $670 billion and employing millions; submitted articles addressed the field generally rather than the specific endeavor; the expert letter did not show how the company would extend beyond its clientele; and government-initiative claims lacked corrobora…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the projected direct/indirect jobs (4-31 direct, up to 47 indirect) and revenue/tax figures were not significant relative to a franchising industry contributing $670 billion and employing millions; submitted articles addressed the field generally rather than the specific endeavor; the expert letter did not show how the company would extend beyond its clientele; and government-initiative claims lacked corroboration showing impact on the field more broadly.
AAO agreed that the evidence did not overcome the Director's denial. The Petitioner on appeal failed to address the Director's conclusion about the letters, the letter of intent to invest post-dated the denial, was non-binding, and raised unresolved questions about continued ownership and control.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the evidence did not overcome the Director's denial. The Petitioner on appeal failed to address the Director's conclusion about the letters, the letter of intent to invest post-dated the denial, was non-binding, and raised unresolved questions about continued ownership and control.
AAO found the Petitioner's submitted materials addressed the importance of the financial services field generally rather than the national implications of her specific proposed endeavor.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's submitted materials addressed the importance of the financial services field generally rather than the national implications of her specific proposed endeavor. The business plan projected only modest near-term employment (4 full-time employees in year one) and lacked sufficient details and supporting evidence regarding how she would achieve stated economic impact objectives, what funds were committed, and how her endeavor would substantially impact job creation and economic growth regionally or nationally.
AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was met based on the Petitioner's participation as a jury member in a painting, recitation, and theatrical art competition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that this criterion was met based on the Petitioner's participation as a jury member in a painting, recitation, and theatrical art competition.