official academic record showing degree, diploma, or certificate relating to area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal under Matter of Soriano. Even if considered, the Petitioner failed to explain how a general high school equivalency diploma relates to his claimed area of exceptional ability, and the GED was obtained after the petition filing date.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO declined to consider new evidence submitted for the first time on appeal under Matter of Soriano. Even if considered, the Petitioner failed to explain how a general high school equivalency diploma relates to his claimed area of exceptional ability, and the GED was obtained after the petition filing date.
ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The AAO agreed that neither employer letter contained sufficient detail to show at least ten years of experience in the occupation sought. Work descriptions after 2015 appeared to relate more to administrative, financial, and HR duties rather than the proposed robotics development endeavor.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed that neither employer letter contained sufficient detail to show at least ten years of experience in the occupation sought. Work descriptions after 2015 appeared to relate more to administrative, financial, and HR duties rather than the proposed robotics development endeavor.
AAO noted that factors relating to a petitioner's qualifications, experience, or educational credentials relate to the second Dhanasar prong, but did not separately adjudicate this prong because the first prong was dispositive.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that factors relating to a petitioner's qualifications, experience, or educational credentials relate to the second Dhanasar prong, but did not separately adjudicate this prong because the first prong was dispositive.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))
AAO 为什么未被说服
The I-G-R- letter praises the Petitioner's skills on a single series but does not document significant contributions to the broader audiovisual industry. Awards received by productions he worked on were given in categories (e.g., best director, best actress) that do not include the Petitioner, and he submitted no nominations or awards in his own name.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The I-G-R- letter praises the Petitioner's skills on a single series but does not document significant contributions to the broader audiovisual industry. Awards received by productions he worked on were given in categories (e.g., best director, best actress) that do not include the Petitioner, and he submitted no nominations or awards in his own name.