offered position requires advanced degree professional
AAO 为什么未被说服
The labor certification requires only a bachelor's plus 27 months' experience, which is less than a master's or a baccalaureate followed by five years of progressive experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The labor certification requires only a bachelor's plus 27 months' experience, which is less than a master's or a baccalaureate followed by five years of progressive experience.
on balance, waiving the job offer requirement would benefit the United States
裁决如何说明
AAO found SCOPS' denial of this prong internally inconsistent with the RFE and largely conclusory, declining to reach the merits and instead remanding for a reasoned decision.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found SCOPS' denial of this prong internally inconsistent with the RFE and largely conclusory, declining to reach the merits and instead remanding for a reasoned decision.
AAO declined to reach the merits of this prong, finding instead that SCOPS' analysis was internally contradictory and deficient, and remanded for a reasoned determination.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the merits of this prong, finding instead that SCOPS' analysis was internally contradictory and deficient, and remanded for a reasoned determination.
Petitioner's initial filing did not include the required annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements for 2023, and the record does not indicate such evidence was unavailable.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner's initial filing did not include the required annual reports, federal tax returns, or audited financial statements for 2023, and the record does not indicate such evidence was unavailable.
AAO found the record did not show the Beneficiary's work extended beyond his employer and its customers to impact the broader industry or field at a nationally important level. Support letters praised past skills but did not address the proposed endeavor's prospective impact, and the general policy documents did not discuss the Beneficiary's specific work.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record did not show the Beneficiary's work extended beyond his employer and its customers to impact the broader industry or field at a nationally important level. Support letters praised past skills but did not address the proposed endeavor's prospective impact, and the general policy documents did not discuss the Beneficiary's specific work. Individual projects were not shown to be unique, innovative, or to have national or global implications.
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance, noting the expert letter merely restated Petitioner's assertions without corroborating detail, the business plan projections lacked evidentiary basis, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate how her methods would have national or global implications beyond individual clients, nor that her proposed endeavor would have substantial positive econo…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the Petitioner failed to establish national importance, noting the expert letter merely restated Petitioner's assertions without corroborating detail, the business plan projections lacked evidentiary basis, and the Petitioner did not demonstrate how her methods would have national or global implications beyond individual clients, nor that her proposed endeavor would have substantial positive economic effects in an economically depressed area.
AAO agreed that while the endeavor has substantial merit, the employment projections (2–8 employees over five years) and net profit forecasts ($27,538–$62,425) are too modest to show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that while the endeavor has substantial merit, the employment projections (2–8 employees over five years) and net profit forecasts ($27,538–$62,425) are too modest to show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects. The Petitioner did not demonstrate how his company's impact would extend beyond individual clients to the SME sector broadly, did not identify specific government initiatives, and his expert letter made unsupported claims without showing the services are unique or innovative.
AAO disagreed with SCOPS on substantial merit, finding the personal statement and articles place the endeavor within Dhanasar's contemplated areas, but agreed that national importance was not established because the record shows no broader implications beyond the Petitioner or its clients and no national/global impact within the field.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagreed with SCOPS on substantial merit, finding the personal statement and articles place the endeavor within Dhanasar's contemplated areas, but agreed that national importance was not established because the record shows no broader implications beyond the Petitioner or its clients and no national/global impact within the field.