The bank statements and pay stubs do not establish the salary range of others in the fields of engineering and management, or among engineering project managers with similar roles, so it cannot be determined whether the Petitioner's salary is high in relation to others in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The bank statements and pay stubs do not establish the salary range of others in the fields of engineering and management, or among engineering project managers with similar roles, so it cannot be determined whether the Petitioner's salary is high in relation to others in the field.
AAO maintained that the petitioner did not show the endeavor would broadly impact the oil and gas industry, employ U.S. workers, or have substantial positive economic effects, and the new declaration spoke to substantial merit rather than national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO maintained that the petitioner did not show the endeavor would broadly impact the oil and gas industry, employ U.S. workers, or have substantial positive economic effects, and the new declaration spoke to substantial merit rather than national importance.
AAO found that even accepting the Petitioner's framing that she did not claim HUBZone program eligibility, merely locating a business in underutilized zones would not establish national importance. The record failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond limited local benefits to clients and employees.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that even accepting the Petitioner's framing that she did not claim HUBZone program eligibility, merely locating a business in underutilized zones would not establish national importance. The record failed to demonstrate broader implications beyond limited local benefits to clients and employees.
The Petitioner's programs totaled less than four years and did not constitute a foreign equivalent of a baccalaureate. The credential evaluator's reliance on a three-years-experience-per-year-of-education rule was unsupported because that rule (8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(D)(5)) applies to H-1B classification, not EB-2 immigrant classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's programs totaled less than four years and did not constitute a foreign equivalent of a baccalaureate. The credential evaluator's reliance on a three-years-experience-per-year-of-education rule was unsupported because that rule (8 C.F.R. § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(D)(5)) applies to H-1B classification, not EB-2 immigrant classification.
AAO found the director erred by focusing on the CEO title rather than the actual work to be performed; the clinical radiological treatments the clinic would provide are directly related to the petitioner's medical training.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the director erred by focusing on the CEO title rather than the actual work to be performed; the clinical radiological treatments the clinic would provide are directly related to the petitioner's medical training.
AAO found the submitted articles and reports provided only general background on the pharmaceutical industry and did not relate specifically to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor. Claimed economic benefits from a new production facility were tied to Brazil, not the United States.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the submitted articles and reports provided only general background on the pharmaceutical industry and did not relate specifically to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor. Claimed economic benefits from a new production facility were tied to Brazil, not the United States. The Petitioner failed to explain how working as a single pharmaceutical industrial production manager for one employer would extend beyond that employer to impact the field at a nationally important level.