AAO explicitly declined to fully address the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, though it noted in passing that the record did not support the requisite level of expertise.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to fully address the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, though it noted in passing that the record did not support the requisite level of expertise.
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's evidence failed to demonstrate prospective national-level impact. The business plan, reference and expert letters, and online publications did not address her specific proposed undertaking. She also failed to show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's evidence failed to demonstrate prospective national-level impact. The business plan, reference and expert letters, and online publications did not address her specific proposed undertaking. She also failed to show significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects.
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on failure to establish national importance.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on failure to establish national importance.
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on failure to establish national importance.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third Dhanasar prong, reserving it as unnecessary to the ultimate decision because the Petitioner was already ineligible based on failure to establish national importance.
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor appeared limited to the Petitioner's current position as a data programmer analyst at his current employer, with impact limited to that employer and its patients. The Petitioner's evidence of economic effects was too general to show substantial positive economic impact, and his citation count of 48 was not placed in context showing it exceeded field norms.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor appeared limited to the Petitioner's current position as a data programmer analyst at his current employer, with impact limited to that employer and its patients. The Petitioner's evidence of economic effects was too general to show substantial positive economic impact, and his citation count of 48 was not placed in context showing it exceeded field norms. The supporting letters addressed past work rather than the proposed endeavor.