可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 42214230

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong, as the Petitioner was already ineligible based on the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the second prong, as the Petitioner was already ineligible based on the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_11_B5203; source_row=38588
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong, as the Petitioner was already ineligible based on the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach the third prong, as the Petitioner was already ineligible based on the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_11_B5203; source_row=38589
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The Director found the judging criterion met and AAO did not disturb this finding.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found the judging criterion met and AAO did not disturb this finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_01_B2203; source_row=38552
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The Director found the scholarly articles criterion met and AAO did not disturb this finding.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found the scholarly articles criterion met and AAO did not disturb this finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_01_B2203; source_row=38554
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

生物医学 / 生命科学

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

证据为何得到认可

The Director found the original contributions of major significance criterion met and AAO did not disturb this finding.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found the original contributions of major significance criterion met and AAO did not disturb this finding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_01_B2203; source_row=38553
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Foreign equivalent of U.S. bachelor's degree

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the diploma, transcripts, and educational evaluation establish the Petitioner holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the diploma, transcripts, and educational evaluation establish the Petitioner holds the foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_12_B5203; source_row=38590
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate work experience in the specialty

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the accountant letter inadmissible without the original Portuguese document, found company documents insufficient to show full-time management for five years, noted concerns about concurrent management of two companies, and found business associate letters lacking in specificity about duration of engagement.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the accountant letter inadmissible without the original Portuguese document, found company documents insufficient to show full-time management for five years, noted concerns about concurrent management of two companies, and found business associate letters lacking in specificity about duration of engagement.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_12_B5203; source_row=38591
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Advanced degree qualification (five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience)

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's approval of the EB-2 threshold finding on appeal, concluding the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. On motion, the Petitioner waived any challenge to this finding by declining to dispute it.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's approval of the EB-2 threshold finding on appeal, concluding the evidence was insufficient to demonstrate five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience. On motion, the Petitioner waived any challenge to this finding by declining to dispute it.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_04_B5203; source_row=38563
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence addressed nutrition and dietitian work in general, not her specific proposed endeavor. Expert and recommendation letters did not address the proposed endeavor specifically. Projected employment of 8–34 people and tax/wage projections lacked supporting evidence of significant economic impact.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence addressed nutrition and dietitian work in general, not her specific proposed endeavor. Expert and recommendation letters did not address the proposed endeavor specifically. Projected employment of 8–34 people and tax/wage projections lacked supporting evidence of significant economic impact. The telehealth platform would not have national implications beyond the individual patients it serves.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-07-01_01_B5203; source_row=38556
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the Petitioner's endeavor has substantial merit and he has relevant experience in the vehicle auction industry, the record shows the impact of his proposed consulting firm would be limited to its employees and clients, without demonstrating broader national or global implications.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the Petitioner's endeavor has substantial merit and he has relevant experience in the vehicle auction industry, the record shows the impact of his proposed consulting firm would be limited to its employees and clients, without demonstrating broader national or global implications. The articles about management consulting and small businesses failed to show how the Petitioner's specific endeavor would reach the level of national importance contemplated by Dhanasar.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_09_B5203; source_row=38549
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评