可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 42414250

NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner did not demonstrate national importance. On motion, the Petitioner presented no new material facts or valid legal argument to disturb this conclusion.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner did not demonstrate national importance. On motion, the Petitioner presented no new material facts or valid legal argument to disturb this conclusion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_08_B5203; source_row=38546
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, finding the Petitioner's appeal offered no new arguments or evidence and failed to identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact, which alone is grounds for dismissal.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, finding the Petitioner's appeal offered no new arguments or evidence and failed to identify any erroneous conclusion of law or fact, which alone is grounds for dismissal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_04_B5203; source_row=38531
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWten years experience未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

ten years experience

ten years full-time experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

None of the submitted letters indicated full-time work, only one letter contained specific dates of employment covering only several months, and the remaining letters lacked specific dates and provided only general descriptions of duties. The self-employment letter also failed to indicate full-time work and provided only general descriptions.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
None of the submitted letters indicated full-time work, only one letter contained specific dates of employment covering only several months, and the remaining letters lacked specific dates and provided only general descriptions of duties. The self-employment letter also failed to indicate full-time work and provided only general descriptions.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_07_B5203; source_row=38538
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

license or certification

license or certification

证据为何得到认可

AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the licensure criterion was met.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not disturb the Director's finding that the licensure criterion was met.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_07_B5203; source_row=38539
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions

AAO 为什么未被说服

Interview photographs did not indicate reasons or content; news articles recognized some past achievements but did not address significant contributions to the field; letters from colleagues and clients praised professional skills but did not evidence recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional organizations.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Interview photographs did not indicate reasons or content; news articles recognized some past achievements but did not address significant contributions to the field; letters from colleagues and clients praised professional skills but did not evidence recognition for achievements and significant contributions by peers, governmental entities, or professional organizations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_07_B5203; source_row=38542
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

academic record

official academic record

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the nursing technician diploma and transcript constitute an official academic record relating to the area of exceptional ability, meeting the plain language of the regulation.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the nursing technician diploma and transcript constitute an official academic record relating to the area of exceptional ability, meeting the plain language of the regulation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_07_B5203; source_row=38537
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because dismissal was decided on the first prong alone.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the second prong because dismissal was decided on the first prong alone.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_08_B5203; source_row=38547
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because dismissal was decided on the first prong alone.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved judgment on the third prong because dismissal was decided on the first prong alone.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_08_B5203; source_row=38548
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved this criterion because even if met it would not change the outcome—the Petitioner could only reach two criteria total, short of the required three.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this criterion because even if met it would not change the outcome—the Petitioner could only reach two criteria total, short of the required three.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_01_B2203; source_row=38521
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

证据为何得到认可

AAO found sufficient documentary evidence that the Petitioner received nationally and internationally recognized awards from the IBJJF, including First Place Gold at a top IBJJF tournament in 2016, and withdrew the Director's determination on this issue.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found sufficient documentary evidence that the Petitioner received nationally and internationally recognized awards from the IBJJF, including First Place Gold at a top IBJJF tournament in 2016, and withdrew the Director's determination on this issue.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-28_01_B2203; source_row=38517
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评