AAO declines to make a substantive finding and remands so the Director can analyze the business plan, expert opinion, and other evidence and explain the reasoning under both substantial merit and national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declines to make a substantive finding and remands so the Director can analyze the business plan, expert opinion, and other evidence and explain the reasoning under both substantial merit and national importance.
AAO expressly reserved this prong, noting its de novo review did not appear to support the Director's finding but declining to reach it because the first prong and advanced-degree findings were dispositive.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO expressly reserved this prong, noting its de novo review did not appear to support the Director's finding but declining to reach it because the first prong and advanced-degree findings were dispositive.
published material about the individual in professional or major trade publications or other major media
证据为何得到认可
AAO disagrees with the Director's dismissal of the publications as mere web portals, finding credible letters and circulation evidence demonstrate the publications are widely known professional publications, and finds the New York Times pandemic article qualifies as published material about the Petitioner even though it featured several artists.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagrees with the Director's dismissal of the publications as mere web portals, finding credible letters and circulation evidence demonstrate the publications are widely known professional publications, and finds the New York Times pandemic article qualifies as published material about the Petitioner even though it featured several artists.
AAO concluded that the Petitioner's evidence and personal statement focused on the importance of the marketing industry as a whole rather than the specific prospective impact of his proposed consultancy.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded that the Petitioner's evidence and personal statement focused on the importance of the marketing industry as a whole rather than the specific prospective impact of his proposed consultancy. The record did not establish that the endeavor would impact the industry more broadly or have substantial positive economic effects beyond his prospective clients, and the Petitioner's statements about promoting 'new ideas' were insufficiently specific.
high salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the wage comparisons for 'electronics technician' did not meet the burden for a senior field service engineer, and that the Petitioner failed to establish whether his wages included overtime or other additional pay unrelated to exceptional ability, making the salary comparison unreliable.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the wage comparisons for 'electronics technician' did not meet the burden for a senior field service engineer, and that the Petitioner failed to establish whether his wages included overtime or other additional pay unrelated to exceptional ability, making the salary comparison unreliable.
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. The business plan lacked sufficient detail and documentation to support claims of broad prospective impact beyond the Petitioner's clientele, projected employment of 15 direct and 31 indirect jobs was insufficient to demonstrate substantial economic impact, and the evidence did not show the consulting endeavor would affect the agricultural sector broadly at…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner failed to show national importance. The business plan lacked sufficient detail and documentation to support claims of broad prospective impact beyond the Petitioner's clientele, projected employment of 15 direct and 31 indirect jobs was insufficient to demonstrate substantial economic impact, and the evidence did not show the consulting endeavor would affect the agricultural sector broadly at a national level.