可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 43514360

EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high remuneration for services

证据为何得到认可

AAO declined to disturb the Director's determination that the Petitioner met the high remuneration criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to disturb the Director's determination that the Petitioner met the high remuneration criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_01_B2203; source_row=38341
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to fully reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold number of criteria at step 1. AAO nevertheless noted the record in the aggregate does not support a finding of the required level of extraordinary ability.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to fully reach the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the threshold number of criteria at step 1. AAO nevertheless noted the record in the aggregate does not support a finding of the required level of extraordinary ability.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=38353
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

裁决如何说明

Petitioner did not address or contest on appeal the Director's conclusion that he does not meet this criterion, so AAO deemed the issue waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Petitioner did not address or contest on appeal the Director's conclusion that he does not meet this criterion, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=38348
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation

证据为何得到认可

AAO reviewed the organizational charter, recommendation and support letters, and published material about the distinguished reputation of [REDACTED], and concluded the Petitioner met this criterion. The Director's decision on this criterion was withdrawn.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reviewed the organizational charter, recommendation and support letters, and published material about the distinguished reputation of [REDACTED], and concluded the Petitioner met this criterion. The Director's decision on this criterion was withdrawn.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=38352
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging the work of others in the field

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met this criterion; no further discussion on appeal.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met this criterion; no further discussion on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_02_B2203; source_row=38350
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理经理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, making resolution of prong three unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, making resolution of prong three unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_01_B5203; source_row=38346
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理经理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, making resolution of prong two unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the Petitioner failed to establish prong one, making resolution of prong two unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_01_B5203; source_row=38345
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理学士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

The AAO reserved the second prong because the failure to establish the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reserved the second prong because the failure to establish the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_06_B5203; source_row=38367
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理学士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

The AAO reserved the third prong because the failure to establish the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO reserved the third prong because the failure to establish the first prong was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_06_B5203; source_row=38368
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

Because the first prong was dispositive, the AAO declined to reach and reserved determination on the third prong.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the first prong was dispositive, the AAO declined to reach and reserved determination on the third prong.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-21_05_B5203; source_row=38365
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评