AAO found that although the endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because he focused on his personal qualifications and the general importance of the security field rather than the specific prospective impact of his proposed endeavor.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that although the endeavor has substantial merit, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance because he focused on his personal qualifications and the general importance of the security field rather than the specific prospective impact of his proposed endeavor. His unsupported revenue and staffing projections and generic claims of economic impact did not show broader implications at the level of national importance.
AAO agreed that the endeavor has substantial merit but found the record does not establish national importance. The business plan's geographic expansion projections lack sufficient supporting evidence to show impact beyond the Petitioner's clientele; the societal welfare/drug trafficking claims are not adequately documented to show broad national effects; and the projected 22-employee workforce and revenue figures are unsup…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the endeavor has substantial merit but found the record does not establish national importance. The business plan's geographic expansion projections lack sufficient supporting evidence to show impact beyond the Petitioner's clientele; the societal welfare/drug trafficking claims are not adequately documented to show broad national effects; and the projected 22-employee workforce and revenue figures are unsupported by objective data sufficient to show substantial positive economic effects at a national level.
AAO agreed the Director did not mischaracterize the proposed endeavor and that the record fails to show the specific consultancy business has potential to impact teacher shortages or the educational system at a national level. The record also lacks sufficient evidence of claimed positive economic benefits.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Director did not mischaracterize the proposed endeavor and that the record fails to show the specific consultancy business has potential to impact teacher shortages or the educational system at a national level. The record also lacks sufficient evidence of claimed positive economic benefits.
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed the Director imposed extra requirements not found in the regulation. Evidence of the Petitioner's work displayed at a joint artistic project organized in part by a national centre for artistic creation in public space, where he was referred to as one of seven artists displaying participatory art practices, was sufficient.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Director imposed extra requirements not found in the regulation. Evidence of the Petitioner's work displayed at a joint artistic project organized in part by a national centre for artistic creation in public space, where he was referred to as one of seven artists displaying participatory art practices, was sufficient.
AAO found the Director improperly imposed extra requirements not in the regulation. Evidence of reviewing a paper submitted to an international conference and serving on a multidisciplinary admissions jury was sufficient.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director improperly imposed extra requirements not in the regulation. Evidence of reviewing a paper submitted to an international conference and serving on a multidisciplinary admissions jury was sufficient.