可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 44314440

NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but concluded the Petitioner did not document prospective impact beyond her own business and clients. Recommendation letters spoke to her personal qualifications (prong two), industry shortage evidence does not establish national importance, and the business plan's projected jobs/wages/taxes lacked corroborating evidence and a sufficient direct evidentiary tie.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but concluded the Petitioner did not document prospective impact beyond her own business and clients. Recommendation letters spoke to her personal qualifications (prong two), industry shortage evidence does not establish national importance, and the business plan's projected jobs/wages/taxes lacked corroborating evidence and a sufficient direct evidentiary tie.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_02_B5203; source_row=38196
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but concluded national importance was not established because the Petitioner focused on the importance of mental health and the psychology field generally, did not demonstrate broader national or global implications of her specific endeavor, and did not document substantial positive economic effects or significant U.S. job creation potential.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but concluded national importance was not established because the Petitioner focused on the importance of mental health and the psychology field generally, did not demonstrate broader national or global implications of her specific endeavor, and did not document substantial positive economic effects or significant U.S. job creation potential.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_04_B5203; source_row=38202
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agrees the record fails to establish national importance because the Petitioner did not articulate specific errors by the Director and did not demonstrate broader implications of his consulting endeavor.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees the record fails to establish national importance because the Petitioner did not articulate specific errors by the Director and did not demonstrate broader implications of his consulting endeavor.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_03_B5203; source_row=38199
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理学士

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit (potential to help U.S. businesses increase revenues and create jobs) but found the Petitioner did not show national importance: the projected revenues/net income, lack of impact on a depressed area, and failure to show broader effect on the management consulting field were insufficient. AAO analogized to the STEM-teaching petitioner in Dhanasar.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit (potential to help U.S. businesses increase revenues and create jobs) but found the Petitioner did not show national importance: the projected revenues/net income, lack of impact on a depressed area, and failure to show broader effect on the management consulting field were insufficient. AAO analogized to the STEM-teaching petitioner in Dhanasar.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_01_B5203; source_row=38193
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

The AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to show how providing public relations services would have broader implications in the field or for the national economy. Evidence about the importance of the PR profession generally did not establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, and the expert opinion letter lacked relevance and probative value on this question.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO agreed the Petitioner failed to show how providing public relations services would have broader implications in the field or for the national economy. Evidence about the importance of the PR profession generally did not establish national importance of the specific proposed endeavor, and the expert opinion letter lacked relevance and probative value on this question.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_05_B5203; source_row=38205
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理学士

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved this prong because the national-importance failure resolved the appeal.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this prong because the national-importance failure resolved the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_01_B5203; source_row=38194
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理学士

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the Petitioner's appellate arguments about the waiver's purported benefits to the United States, citing Bagamasbad.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the Petitioner's appellate arguments about the waiver's purported benefits to the United States, citing Bagamasbad.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_01_B5203; source_row=38195
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the record shows the Beneficiary performed in a critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record shows the Beneficiary performed in a critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_01_B2203; source_row=38191
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the record shows the Beneficiary displayed his work at jewelry exhibitions, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record shows the Beneficiary displayed his work at jewelry exhibitions, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_01_B2203; source_row=38190
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

AAO found the record includes documentation indicating the Beneficiary has judged the work of jewelry makers, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the record includes documentation indicating the Beneficiary has judged the work of jewelry makers, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-06-14_01_B2203; source_row=38189
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评