AAO found that the Petitioner's reliance on generalized information about software development, healthcare, and business did not establish the specific endeavor's broader implications. Reduced travel costs for a limited set of patients, and software facilitating existing examination types, do not demonstrate national or global implications or substantial positive economic effects.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's reliance on generalized information about software development, healthcare, and business did not establish the specific endeavor's broader implications. Reduced travel costs for a limited set of patients, and software facilitating existing examination types, do not demonstrate national or global implications or substantial positive economic effects. The Petitioner also waived any employment-of-workers argument on appeal by asserting he would act only as an independent contractor.
five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience in specialty
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the employment book, the document listing responsibilities per position, and the letter confirming specific employment dates together demonstrated at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the employment book, the document listing responsibilities per position, and the letter confirming specific employment dates together demonstrated at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.
AAO adopted and affirmed the director's finding, concluding that the record did not sufficiently establish the petitioner's specific endeavor or its national importance, and that there was no probative evidence of the company's realistic potential to operate, create jobs, or generate substantial positive economic effects.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the director's finding, concluding that the record did not sufficiently establish the petitioner's specific endeavor or its national importance, and that there was no probative evidence of the company's realistic potential to operate, create jobs, or generate substantial positive economic effects.
AAO found the credential evaluation insufficient because it did not explain how three years of foreign study equated to four years of U.S. study, and AACRAO EDGE indicates a 3-year Titulo de Bacharel is comparable only to 3 years of U.S. university study, not a full bachelor's degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the credential evaluation insufficient because it did not explain how three years of foreign study equated to four years of U.S. study, and AACRAO EDGE indicates a 3-year Titulo de Bacharel is comparable only to 3 years of U.S. university study, not a full bachelor's degree.
Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed that the employment letters submitted in response to the RFE failed to demonstrate five years of progressive experience in the specialty as shown by advancing levels of responsibility and knowledge.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the employment letters submitted in response to the RFE failed to demonstrate five years of progressive experience in the specialty as shown by advancing levels of responsibility and knowledge.