AAO found that the Director overlooked a compliant employer letter in the original filing that demonstrated more than six years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience, establishing the advanced degree equivalency.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Director overlooked a compliant employer letter in the original filing that demonstrated more than six years of qualifying post-baccalaureate experience, establishing the advanced degree equivalency.
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong; the Director's finding was vacated because it lacked the required explanation and analysis, and the matter was remanded.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong; the Director's finding was vacated because it lacked the required explanation and analysis, and the matter was remanded.
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong; the Director's finding was vacated as the entire NIW analysis lacked the required explanation, and the matter was remanded.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach a substantive conclusion on this prong; the Director's finding was vacated as the entire NIW analysis lacked the required explanation, and the matter was remanded.
official academic record / degree or certificate from institution of learning
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the certificates submitted did not adequately establish that the issuing entities were colleges, universities, schools, or other institutions of learning relating to the area of exceptional ability, and the letters submitted on appeal only attested to employment activities rather than the institutional status of the issuers.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the certificates submitted did not adequately establish that the issuing entities were colleges, universities, schools, or other institutions of learning relating to the area of exceptional ability, and the letters submitted on appeal only attested to employment activities rather than the institutional status of the issuers.
at least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the employer letters lacked specific start and end dates, failed to specify whether employment was full-time, and did not provide detailed job descriptions sufficient to evaluate whether prior experience was in the same occupation as the intended chief executive officer and coach role.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the employer letters lacked specific start and end dates, failed to specify whether employment was full-time, and did not provide detailed job descriptions sufficient to evaluate whether prior experience was in the same occupation as the intended chief executive officer and coach role.
license to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner conceded in response to the RFE that there is no formal or legally regulated license or certification in Brazil required to practice capoeira, so this criterion was not demonstrated.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner conceded in response to the RFE that there is no formal or legally regulated license or certification in Brazil required to practice capoeira, so this criterion was not demonstrated.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field by peers, governmental entities, or professional or business organizations
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that while the letters showed the Petitioner to be a competent and valued professional, they did not evidence achievements or significant contributions showing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that while the letters showed the Petitioner to be a competent and valued professional, they did not evidence achievements or significant contributions showing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.