New facts supported by evidence to warrant reopening
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner did not submit new facts supported by documentary evidence addressed to the most recent AAO decision dismissing her first combined motion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not submit new facts supported by documentary evidence addressed to the most recent AAO decision dismissing her first combined motion.
Erroneous application of law or USCIS policy in most recent decision
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner failed to establish that the AAO incorrectly applied the law or USCIS policy in dismissing her first combined motion, as her brief did not address that decision at all.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner failed to establish that the AAO incorrectly applied the law or USCIS policy in dismissing her first combined motion, as her brief did not address that decision at all.
AAO found the Petitioner provided minimal details about his proposed endeavor, had not yet implemented the SMED system as of filing, had not written peer-reviewed papers or given presentations, and did not demonstrate that schools, universities, or airlines had expressed interest in his services. His self-description as an entrepreneur was unsupported by evidence of any business venture.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner provided minimal details about his proposed endeavor, had not yet implemented the SMED system as of filing, had not written peer-reviewed papers or given presentations, and did not demonstrate that schools, universities, or airlines had expressed interest in his services. His self-description as an entrepreneur was unsupported by evidence of any business venture.