可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 47814790

NIW可比证据未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

可比证据

comparable evidence (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(iii))

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner relied on comparable evidence for the first time on motion; the AAO declined to consider this new basis.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner relied on comparable evidence for the first time on motion; the AAO declined to consider this new basis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_03_B5203; source_row=37649
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

license or certification (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(C))

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on motion to reopen; the AAO declined to consider it because new eligibility bases are not properly raised at the motion stage.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner raised this criterion for the first time on motion to reopen; the AAO declined to consider it because new eligibility bases are not properly raised at the motion stage.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_03_B5203; source_row=37648
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))

AAO 为什么未被说服

On motion the Petitioner repeated previously offered factors and added an eighth-grade Geography Olympiad finish; the AAO concluded these were not new facts and did not constitute recognition from peers, governmental entities, or professional/business organizations.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
On motion the Petitioner repeated previously offered factors and added an eighth-grade Geography Olympiad finish; the AAO concluded these were not new facts and did not constitute recognition from peers, governmental entities, or professional/business organizations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_03_B5203; source_row=37647
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

membership in professional association (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))

证据为何得到认可

The AAO had previously determined on appeal that the Petitioner met this additional criterion; not at issue on motion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The AAO had previously determined on appeal that the Petitioner met this additional criterion; not at issue on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_03_B5203; source_row=37646
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO noted the letters from colleagues and prospective clients relate to the second prong (focusing on the foreign national), but did not make a finding on this prong because the first prong was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted the letters from colleagues and prospective clients relate to the second prong (focusing on the foreign national), but did not make a finding on this prong because the first prong was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_06_B5203; source_row=37658
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree professional qualification

证据为何得到认可

AAO consults AACRAO EDGE and concludes the Petitioner's Russian diploma awarding the qualification of Engineer is equivalent to a U.S. master's degree.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO consults AACRAO EDGE and concludes the Petitioner's Russian diploma awarding the qualification of Engineer is equivalent to a U.S. master's degree.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_08_B5203; source_row=37664
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director's reversal from the RFE finding to the final decision was procedurally improper because it denied the Petitioner a chance to cure the record, and remanded for a proper evaluation.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's reversal from the RFE finding to the final decision was procedurally improper because it denied the Petitioner a chance to cure the record, and remanded for a proper evaluation.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_05_B5203; source_row=37655
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach the merits, finding the Director's national importance analysis was structurally confusing and lacked meaningful detail, making meaningful appellate review impossible. AAO remanded for a full and complete analysis.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach the merits, finding the Director's national importance analysis was structurally confusing and lacked meaningful detail, making meaningful appellate review impossible. AAO remanded for a full and complete analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_05_B5203; source_row=37654
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director's third-prong analysis contained no meaningful analysis to review and remanded for a proper balancing analysis addressing the Petitioner's arguments and evidence.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's third-prong analysis contained no meaningful analysis to review and remanded for a proper balancing analysis addressing the Petitioner's arguments and evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_05_B5203; source_row=37656
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

土木 / 结构工程

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

On balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO found the Director's third-prong analysis inadequate because, while it identified relevant factors, it did not sufficiently discuss the evidence or explain the decisional weight given to each balancing factor. AAO remanded for proper analysis.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's third-prong analysis inadequate because, while it identified relevant factors, it did not sufficiently discuss the evidence or explain the decisional weight given to each balancing factor. AAO remanded for proper analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-05-16_04_B5203; source_row=37653
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评