recognition for achievements and contributions (F)
裁决如何说明
The Petitioner did not assert error in the Director's conclusions regarding criterion (F) and did not claim to meet it on appeal; the issue is considered waived.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not assert error in the Director's conclusions regarding criterion (F) and did not claim to meet it on appeal; the issue is considered waived.
AAO found the employment record was riddled with inconsistencies across documents, employment letters failed to specify full-time status, and overlapping claimed employment periods further undermined the reliability of the claimed ten years of full-time experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the employment record was riddled with inconsistencies across documents, employment letters failed to specify full-time status, and overlapping claimed employment periods further undermined the reliability of the claimed ten years of full-time experience.
AAO agreed with the Director that the license issued 18 months after filing cannot establish eligibility at the time the petition was filed, and the Petitioner offered no substantive response to this deficiency on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the license issued 18 months after filing cannot establish eligibility at the time the petition was filed, and the Petitioner offered no substantive response to this deficiency on appeal.
The Petitioner did not assert error in the Director's conclusions regarding criterion (A) and did not claim to meet it on appeal; the issue is considered waived.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not assert error in the Director's conclusions regarding criterion (A) and did not claim to meet it on appeal; the issue is considered waived.
AAO found the Petitioner failed to show how his project management services would have broader implications in the IT industry beyond his future employer(s), did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects at a national level, and did not adequately document how his proposed position would have a significant economic impact on the PPM market.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner failed to show how his project management services would have broader implications in the IT industry beyond his future employer(s), did not demonstrate significant potential to employ U.S. workers or substantial positive economic effects at a national level, and did not adequately document how his proposed position would have a significant economic impact on the PPM market. Letters of recommendation did not offer persuasive detail about the impact of the endeavor beyond his employer.
AAO explicitly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility under the first prong, making it unnecessary to reach the second.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved this prong because the Petitioner failed to establish eligibility under the first prong, making it unnecessary to reach the second.