可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 481490

EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

authorship of scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The Petitioner co-authored a scholarly article published in a professional publication (Ciencia et Praxis), satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner co-authored a scholarly article published in a professional publication (Ciencia et Praxis), satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_02_B2203; source_row=44564
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

Although AAO found the change of employment did not materially alter the proposed endeavor, the submitted documents provide only general industry information and do not demonstrate that the specific endeavor will have broader national or global implications.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Although AAO found the change of employment did not materially alter the proposed endeavor, the submitted documents provide only general industry information and do not demonstrate that the specific endeavor will have broader national or global implications. The petitioner's intent to publish in peer-reviewed journals does not establish more-likely-than-not national impact beyond ordinary market research activities, and the endeavor's effects appear primarily confined to the employer and its clients.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_04_B5203; source_row=44576
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO noted that the Petitioner's education, skills, and knowledge relate to the second prong but declined to reach it because the first prong was not established and that was the dispositive issue on motion.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted that the Petitioner's education, skills, and knowledge relate to the second prong but declined to reach it because the first prong was not established and that was the dispositive issue on motion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_01_B5203; source_row=44561
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

金融

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO did not address the third prong, as the first prong was not established and the motion was dismissed on that basis.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not address the third prong, as the first prong was not established and the motion was dismissed on that basis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_01_B5203; source_row=44562
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理经理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed with SCOPS that the record is insufficient. Company awards do not reflect the Petitioner's personal acclaim; employer letters state titles and duties but not outstanding performance; board directorship evidence was internally inconsistent; two recommendation letters contained identical language raising authenticity concerns; and the expert letter improperly relied on prospective economic impact rather than demons…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with SCOPS that the record is insufficient. Company awards do not reflect the Petitioner's personal acclaim; employer letters state titles and duties but not outstanding performance; board directorship evidence was internally inconsistent; two recommendation letters contained identical language raising authenticity concerns; and the expert letter improperly relied on prospective economic impact rather than demonstrated past acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-06_03_B2203; source_row=44572
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Policy Manual guidance that awards from well-known organizations 'may' qualify does not mean all such awards necessarily qualify, and that the number of seemingly similar award categories within just one of the organization's 13 branches undermined the claim that each award is nationally or internationally recognized.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Policy Manual guidance that awards from well-known organizations 'may' qualify does not mean all such awards necessarily qualify, and that the number of seemingly similar award categories within just one of the organization's 13 branches undermined the claim that each award is nationally or internationally recognized. Additionally, the evidence that prominent companies mention the award on their websites was insufficient given the award was listed alongside local and provincial awards, and the record did not establish how many nominees are considered each year.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_02_B2203; source_row=44546
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that photographs and promotional materials posted on a company's social media accounts constitute self-published promotional material rather than displays at artistic exhibitions or showcases, and that accepting the Petitioner's interpretation would render the 'artistic exhibition or showcase' requirement meaningless.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that photographs and promotional materials posted on a company's social media accounts constitute self-published promotional material rather than displays at artistic exhibitions or showcases, and that accepting the Petitioner's interpretation would render the 'artistic exhibition or showcase' requirement meaningless.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_03_B2203; source_row=44553
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the submitted evidence—social media screenshots, a website blurb, and an article—does not establish that the Petitioner is the recipient of a lesser nationally or internationally recognized prize or award, as required by the plain language of the criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the submitted evidence—social media screenshots, a website blurb, and an article—does not establish that the Petitioner is the recipient of a lesser nationally or internationally recognized prize or award, as required by the plain language of the criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_03_B2203; source_row=44551
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the Petitioner lacked corroborating evidence of inventing or patenting the stamp crease, failed to show broad impact or utility, and that an invoice for 3,500 manufactured units does not establish major significance in the field.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner lacked corroborating evidence of inventing or patenting the stamp crease, failed to show broad impact or utility, and that an invoice for 3,500 manufactured units does not establish major significance in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_03_B2203; source_row=44552
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他学士

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner relied almost entirely on support letters from coworkers, and the one outside letter was from a professor lacking expertise in video game or cinematic animation. None of the game reviews mentioned the specific contributions highlighted in the support letters, and the record showed the Beneficiary was one of dozens of animators on her most prominent projects.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner relied almost entirely on support letters from coworkers, and the one outside letter was from a professor lacking expertise in video game or cinematic animation. None of the game reviews mentioned the specific contributions highlighted in the support letters, and the record showed the Beneficiary was one of dozens of animators on her most prominent projects.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2025-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=44543
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
返回测评