published material about the alien in professional or major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
Both kgma.kg articles lacked identified authors as required; the second article was about a trauma surgeon without mention of the Petitioner; and the Petitioner provided no evidence that kgma.kg qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium. New evidence submitted on appeal was not considered because the Petitioner had been given prior notice and opportunity to submit it.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Both kgma.kg articles lacked identified authors as required; the second article was about a trauma surgeon without mention of the Petitioner; and the Petitioner provided no evidence that kgma.kg qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major medium. New evidence submitted on appeal was not considered because the Petitioner had been given prior notice and opportunity to submit it.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director stated the law and relevant considerations but failed to discuss the evidence weighed in performing the balancing analysis, rendering the determination erroneous.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director stated the law and relevant considerations but failed to discuss the evidence weighed in performing the balancing analysis, rendering the determination erroneous.
AAO found the Director's conclusion was unsupported by any analysis of the submitted evidence, and remanded for the Director to properly analyze the evidence under prong one.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's conclusion was unsupported by any analysis of the submitted evidence, and remanded for the Director to properly analyze the evidence under prong one.
AAO found the Director failed to analyze the evidence or explain why it was deficient and remanded for full evaluation of all evidence offered for prong two.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director failed to analyze the evidence or explain why it was deficient and remanded for full evaluation of all evidence offered for prong two.