AAO found the Petitioner's general claims about children's education and submitted articles were insufficient. The Petitioner did not quantify how her endeavor would impact educational problems, and her plans to perform plays for Jewish community children and employ a small staff did not establish national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's general claims about children's education and submitted articles were insufficient. The Petitioner did not quantify how her endeavor would impact educational problems, and her plans to perform plays for Jewish community children and employ a small staff did not establish national importance.
AAO found substantial merit in the aviation supply endeavor but concluded that national importance was not established because the Petitioner provided no specific detail on the national or global implications of her particular endeavor, offered only vague and industry-level job creation claims, and improperly relied on the general importance of the aviation industry rather than the specific impact of her proposed work.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found substantial merit in the aviation supply endeavor but concluded that national importance was not established because the Petitioner provided no specific detail on the national or global implications of her particular endeavor, offered only vague and industry-level job creation claims, and improperly relied on the general importance of the aviation industry rather than the specific impact of her proposed work.
AAO's prior appellate decision agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance or even the precise nature of her proposed endeavor. On motion, the Petitioner did not address this finding or identify specific overlooked evidence.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO's prior appellate decision agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to establish the national importance or even the precise nature of her proposed endeavor. On motion, the Petitioner did not address this finding or identify specific overlooked evidence.
AAO disagrees with the Director and finds the record does not establish that the Aesthetic Professionals Association of Paraná is a professional association as defined by regulation, since membership is not shown to require a U.S. baccalaureate or equivalent.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagrees with the Director and finds the record does not establish that the Aesthetic Professionals Association of Paraná is a professional association as defined by regulation, since membership is not shown to require a U.S. baccalaureate or equivalent.
letters showing at least 10 years of full-time experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO disagrees with Director and finds the Petitioner did not submit letters from former employers as required, did not show full-time employment from May 2009 to February 2012, and produced inconsistencies between resume and submitted letters. The Petitioner also has no experience as a physical therapist.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO disagrees with Director and finds the Petitioner did not submit letters from former employers as required, did not show full-time employment from May 2009 to February 2012, and produced inconsistencies between resume and submitted letters. The Petitioner also has no experience as a physical therapist.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agrees with Director that the special tribute was limited to the local community, the recommendation letters discuss only a small number of clients, and post-filing letters do not establish eligibility at time of filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agrees with Director that the special tribute was limited to the local community, the recommendation letters discuss only a small number of clients, and post-filing letters do not establish eligibility at time of filing.