AAO found that the Petitioner submitted conflicting assertions about pursuing the endeavor full-time versus completing his dissertation, failed to show receipt of any funding, and asserted prospective national impact in an implausibly broad array of fields without objective supporting evidence.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner submitted conflicting assertions about pursuing the endeavor full-time versus completing his dissertation, failed to show receipt of any funding, and asserted prospective national impact in an implausibly broad array of fields without objective supporting evidence. The support letters lacked substantiation for their far-reaching conclusions, and the Petitioner's comparison to Dhanasar was unavailing given his lower level of focus and documentation.
Letters did not document whether experience was full- or part-time, contained dates that overlapped or were inconsistent with the Petitioner's resume and business plan, and the record did not establish self-employment.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Letters did not document whether experience was full- or part-time, contained dates that overlapped or were inconsistent with the Petitioner's resume and business plan, and the record did not establish self-employment.
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis, finding that the Petitioner's evidence of skills, past achievements, and general data about the value of financial advisers does not demonstrate that his specific endeavor would broadly impact the economy at a regional or national level.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis, finding that the Petitioner's evidence of skills, past achievements, and general data about the value of financial advisers does not demonstrate that his specific endeavor would broadly impact the economy at a regional or national level. Evidence of personal qualifications is relevant to the second prong, not the first, and the Petitioner failed to show that his endeavor's impact would extend beyond his specific clients or employers.
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in aggregate that the record does not show the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in aggregate that the record does not show the required acclaim.