AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but national importance was not. The expert opinion letter addressed only event planning and not the supermarket component; the business plan lacked detailed basis for projections; and current sales and job creation projections did not rise to the level of substantial positive economic effects at a national scale.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed substantial merit was shown but national importance was not. The expert opinion letter addressed only event planning and not the supermarket component; the business plan lacked detailed basis for projections; and current sales and job creation projections did not rise to the level of substantial positive economic effects at a national scale.
AAO agreed the endeavor lacks national importance because the Petitioner focused on the importance of the industry rather than his specific endeavor, and provided no evidence (study, business plan, projections) showing implications beyond his direct employer or trainees. The Petitioner himself acknowledged his work was not akin to groundbreaking technology.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the endeavor lacks national importance because the Petitioner focused on the importance of the industry rather than his specific endeavor, and provided no evidence (study, business plan, projections) showing implications beyond his direct employer or trainees. The Petitioner himself acknowledged his work was not akin to groundbreaking technology.
Without evidence of the membership requirements of the union, AAO could not conclude it qualifies as a professional association under the regulatory definition requiring a baccalaureate degree minimum or listing in section 101(a)(32) of the Act.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Without evidence of the membership requirements of the union, AAO could not conclude it qualifies as a professional association under the regulatory definition requiring a baccalaureate degree minimum or listing in section 101(a)(32) of the Act.
The Petitioner's capital shares were paid-in capital, not salary or remuneration for services. His actual taxable income was significantly below the market average salary. The catho.com data was also unreliable for comparison purposes.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's capital shares were paid-in capital, not salary or remuneration for services. His actual taxable income was significantly below the market average salary. The catho.com data was also unreliable for comparison purposes.
The only letter submitted was from the Petitioner's foreign accountant, who was not the Petitioner's employer, and the letter did not describe any job duties. The criterion requires letters from current or former employers with a specific description of duties.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The only letter submitted was from the Petitioner's foreign accountant, who was not the Petitioner's employer, and the letter did not describe any job duties. The criterion requires letters from current or former employers with a specific description of duties.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
Client recommendation letters demonstrated that the Petitioner is well-regarded by clients but did not document specific achievements or significant contributions to the industry or field as required.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Client recommendation letters demonstrated that the Petitioner is well-regarded by clients but did not document specific achievements or significant contributions to the industry or field as required.