final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim
裁决如何说明
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner could not meet the threshold of three criteria. AAO nonetheless noted the overall record fails to show the required acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner could not meet the threshold of three criteria. AAO nonetheless noted the overall record fails to show the required acclaim.
AAO had previously agreed with the Director that the amendment was a prohibited material change under Matter of Izummi, and found the Petitioner waived or abandoned the issue on appeal by failing to address it. In the motions, the Petitioner again did not address the material change issue, making a favorable outcome impossible regardless of the merits of other arguments.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO had previously agreed with the Director that the amendment was a prohibited material change under Matter of Izummi, and found the Petitioner waived or abandoned the issue on appeal by failing to address it. In the motions, the Petitioner again did not address the material change issue, making a favorable outcome impossible regardless of the merits of other arguments.
AAO agreed that the Petitioner had not shown the proposed endeavor has national importance. While acknowledging substantial merit, AAO found that the record lacked evidence of broader impact on the field nationally, that RIMS II statistics were too broad to confirm national importance for the specific endeavor, and that job creation evidence was insufficient.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner had not shown the proposed endeavor has national importance. While acknowledging substantial merit, AAO found that the record lacked evidence of broader impact on the field nationally, that RIMS II statistics were too broad to confirm national importance for the specific endeavor, and that job creation evidence was insufficient. AAO also distinguished the importance of the SME/import-export industry generally from the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor.