可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 5491–5500

NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Exceptional ability (alternative EB-2 basis)

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner does not argue exceptional ability on appeal; because the issue was not raised on appeal, it is considered waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner does not argue exceptional ability on appeal; because the issue was not raised on appeal, it is considered waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_01_B5203; source_row=36530
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

Well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach prong two because the failure under prong one is dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong two because the failure under prong one is dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_01_B5203; source_row=36532
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

On balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because the failure under prong one is dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because the failure under prong one is dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_01_B5203; source_row=36533
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

医学 / 临床

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience

AAO 为什么未被说服

Multiple employment letters fail to meet 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) requirements or contain internal contradictions, and the only qualifying letter covers only approximately two years and eight months rather than five years.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Multiple employment letters fail to meet 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) requirements or contain internal contradictions, and the only qualifying letter covers only approximately two years and eight months rather than five years.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_01_B5203; source_row=36529
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO formally reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step one, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO formally reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed step one, but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not support the required acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_02_B2203; source_row=36540
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance in the field

AAO 为什么未被说服

While the evidence shows the Petitioner's work positively impacted specific businesses and an art program, it does not demonstrate how her designs or creations significantly impacted the broader field of fashion design.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
While the evidence shows the Petitioner's work positively impacted specific businesses and an art program, it does not demonstrate how her designs or creations significantly impacted the broader field of fashion design.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_02_B2203; source_row=36537
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not address the Director's analysis of this criterion on appeal, so the issue is deemed waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not address the Director's analysis of this criterion on appeal, so the issue is deemed waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_02_B2203; source_row=36534
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved prong two because the failure on prong one was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved prong two because the failure on prong one was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_06_B5203; source_row=36563
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved prong three because the failure on prong one was dispositive of the appeal.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved prong three because the failure on prong one was dispositive of the appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_06_B5203; source_row=36564
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved criterion (viii) because the Petitioner had already failed to meet at least three criteria based on the criteria that were addressed, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved criterion (viii) because the Petitioner had already failed to meet at least three criteria based on the criteria that were addressed, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-03-21_04_B2203; source_row=36558
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评