published material about the individual in professional or major media
裁决如何说明
AAO noted in a footnote that the Director may have made a similar error as with criterion (i) by disregarding competitor-focused published materials, and that the Director's denial of criterion (iii) lacked specificity, but AAO did not resolve this criterion on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO noted in a footnote that the Director may have made a similar error as with criterion (i) by disregarding competitor-focused published materials, and that the Director's denial of criterion (iii) lacked specificity, but AAO did not resolve this criterion on appeal.
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed accounting activities are typical of the profession and provide individual employer benefit rather than broader national impact. Expert letters were of little probative value as they did not meaningfully address the specific proposed endeavor or its nationwide implications.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's proposed accounting activities are typical of the profession and provide individual employer benefit rather than broader national impact. Expert letters were of little probative value as they did not meaningfully address the specific proposed endeavor or its nationwide implications.
The Petitioner's proposed activities are typical of a business administrator and he provided no details about unique techniques or methodologies. While individual employers might benefit from his services, the record lacks evidence showing how the endeavor's impact would extend broadly to the national level.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's proposed activities are typical of a business administrator and he provided no details about unique techniques or methodologies. While individual employers might benefit from his services, the record lacks evidence showing how the endeavor's impact would extend broadly to the national level. The expert opinion letter was not persuasive because it did not connect the proposed endeavor to national-level impact and relied on claims inconsistent with the Petitioner's professional plan.
official academic record relating to area of exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Brazilian degree in Human Resources Management does not relate to the petitioner's claimed area of exceptional ability, and the training certificates were not shown to be from an institution of learning or to be official academic records.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the Brazilian degree in Human Resources Management does not relate to the petitioner's claimed area of exceptional ability, and the training certificates were not shown to be from an institution of learning or to be official academic records.
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that Florida requires a Tattoo Artist License for cosmetic tattooing, permanent make-up, microblading, or micropigmentation, and her license satisfies the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Petitioner that Florida requires a Tattoo Artist License for cosmetic tattooing, permanent make-up, microblading, or micropigmentation, and her license satisfies the criterion.
Because the Petitioner did not raise or contest the Director's EB-2 findings on appeal, AAO deemed the issue waived under the principle that an issue not raised on appeal is abandoned.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Because the Petitioner did not raise or contest the Director's EB-2 findings on appeal, AAO deemed the issue waived under the principle that an issue not raised on appeal is abandoned.