AAO agreed the Propeller Club, open to anyone interested in the maritime trade, is not shown to be a professional association as defined in the regulations, but withdrew the Director's additional requirement that membership demonstrate a degree of expertise above the ordinary.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Propeller Club, open to anyone interested in the maritime trade, is not shown to be a professional association as defined in the regulations, but withdrew the Director's additional requirement that membership demonstrate a degree of expertise above the ordinary.
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded the offered salary is at most above-average and the Petitioner used wage data for occupations different from the one identified on the Form I-140 without explanation; an above-average salary alone does not demonstrate exceptional ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the offered salary is at most above-average and the Petitioner used wage data for occupations different from the one identified on the Form I-140 without explanation; an above-average salary alone does not demonstrate exceptional ability.
AAO agreed the credential evaluation impermissibly aggregated multiple credentials and experience, and that the regulations require a single foreign equivalent degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the credential evaluation impermissibly aggregated multiple credentials and experience, and that the regulations require a single foreign equivalent degree.
AAO did not reach this prong because the Director failed to analyze it; the matter is remanded for the Director to make this determination in the first instance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach this prong because the Director failed to analyze it; the matter is remanded for the Director to make this determination in the first instance.
AAO independently consulted the AACRAO EDGE database and determined that the Petitioner's Brazilian dental surgeon degree is equivalent to a U.S. D.D.S. or D.M.D., which qualifies as a first professional degree and thus an advanced degree.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently consulted the AACRAO EDGE database and determined that the Petitioner's Brazilian dental surgeon degree is equivalent to a U.S. D.D.S. or D.M.D., which qualifies as a first professional degree and thus an advanced degree.
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive and it was unnecessary to reach further issues.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the second prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive and it was unnecessary to reach further issues.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive and it was unnecessary to reach further issues.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved its opinion on the third prong because the failure of the first prong was dispositive and it was unnecessary to reach further issues.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed the letters demonstrated value to specific employers rather than recognized industry-wide significance, and the patent application and salvage projects lacked evidence of recognition for significant contributions to the field at the time of filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the letters demonstrated value to specific employers rather than recognized industry-wide significance, and the patent application and salvage projects lacked evidence of recognition for significant contributions to the field at the time of filing.
AAO agreed the letters lack required content and contain inconsistencies, and the Petitioner did not address the Director's specific reasons on appeal.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the letters lack required content and contain inconsistencies, and the Petitioner did not address the Director's specific reasons on appeal.