command of a high salary or other significantly high remuneration
裁决如何说明
AAO reserved this issue because the Petitioner could not fulfill the initial evidentiary requirement of meeting at least three criteria, making a ruling on this criterion unnecessary to the result.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved this issue because the Petitioner could not fulfill the initial evidentiary requirement of meeting at least three criteria, making a ruling on this criterion unnecessary to the result.
AAO agreed the criterion was not met because the Petitioner provided no objective evidence to support her translation argument, and her evidence and assertions did not sufficiently address the Director's concerns.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the criterion was not met because the Petitioner provided no objective evidence to support her translation argument, and her evidence and assertions did not sufficiently address the Director's concerns.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed the criterion is met based on the numerous awards the Petitioner received, including multiple first-place finishes at various MMA and judo championships.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the criterion is met based on the numerous awards the Petitioner received, including multiple first-place finishes at various MMA and judo championships.
AAO found that the proposed endeavor of owning and operating a software company had not been shown to have broader implications beyond its prospective clients. Arguments about STEM shortages, immigrant entrepreneurship, and expert opinion did not demonstrate how the endeavor would impact the field or the U.S. economy more broadly at a level commensurate with national importance.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the proposed endeavor of owning and operating a software company had not been shown to have broader implications beyond its prospective clients. Arguments about STEM shortages, immigrant entrepreneurship, and expert opinion did not demonstrate how the endeavor would impact the field or the U.S. economy more broadly at a level commensurate with national importance. Revenue and employment projections in the business plan were too modest and localized to satisfy the 'substantial positive economic effects' standard.
AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner's plan to provide consulting services would not extend sufficiently beyond her clients and/or employers to impact the financial management industry broadly. Unsupported assertions about economic impact and job creation were insufficient, and the letters of recommendation did not provide persuasive detail about broader impact.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the proposed endeavor has substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner's plan to provide consulting services would not extend sufficiently beyond her clients and/or employers to impact the financial management industry broadly. Unsupported assertions about economic impact and job creation were insufficient, and the letters of recommendation did not provide persuasive detail about broader impact.
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's evidence — including the business plan, personal statement, expert letter, and client testimonial — did not demonstrate that the endeavor's prospective impact would extend beyond the Petitioner's company and its clients to reach a level of substantial positive economic effects nationally. The expert letter lacked numerical analysis and the client letter did not show broader national impact.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the Petitioner's evidence — including the business plan, personal statement, expert letter, and client testimonial — did not demonstrate that the endeavor's prospective impact would extend beyond the Petitioner's company and its clients to reach a level of substantial positive economic effects nationally. The expert letter lacked numerical analysis and the client letter did not show broader national impact.