License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
裁决如何说明
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet the three-criterion threshold and reaching it would be unnecessary to the result.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach this criterion because the Petitioner had already failed to meet the three-criterion threshold and reaching it would be unnecessary to the result.
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the three-criterion threshold, making the analysis unnecessary. AAO nonetheless noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of exceptional ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the three-criterion threshold, making the analysis unnecessary. AAO nonetheless noted in dicta that the record would not support a finding of exceptional ability.
AAO agreed with the Director and additionally noted that registration of a business is not equivalent to individual membership, and that post-filing registration evidence and a pre-filing affiliation certificate nearly seven years old failed to establish timely eligibility.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director and additionally noted that registration of a business is not equivalent to individual membership, and that post-filing registration evidence and a pre-filing affiliation certificate nearly seven years old failed to establish timely eligibility.
At least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the letter did not state the Petitioner was a full-time employee for at least ten years, and other record evidence showed concurrent university studies and employment during the period in question.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the letter did not state the Petitioner was a full-time employee for at least ten years, and other record evidence showed concurrent university studies and employment during the period in question.
AAO concluded the supplemental statement and articles focus on the importance of the construction industry generally rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and that economic benefits were speculative without a direct evidentiary tie.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the supplemental statement and articles focus on the importance of the construction industry generally rather than the Petitioner's specific endeavor, and that economic benefits were speculative without a direct evidentiary tie.
license or certification for the profession (k)(3)(ii)(C)
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded the Linux junior operator certification was not shown to be tailored to or required for the Petitioner's occupation as an operations manager of computerized cuts.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the Linux junior operator certification was not shown to be tailored to or required for the Petitioner's occupation as an operations manager of computerized cuts.