AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in aggregate review that the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to meet the initial evidence threshold, but noted in aggregate review that the record does not establish sustained national or international acclaim.
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish a meaningful distinction between the endeavor and his proposed self-employment, and that his contentions did not overcome the basis for denial or establish the endeavor's national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's finding, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish a meaningful distinction between the endeavor and his proposed self-employment, and that his contentions did not overcome the basis for denial or establish the endeavor's national importance.
sustained national or international acclaim – final merits
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained acclaim, agreeing that the recency of acclaim is required by the plain language of the Act and regulations. Awards received in 2012 or earlier with no subsequent evidence of recognition do not satisfy the 'sustained' requirement. The prior O-1 approval was non-determinative, and additional evidence submitted on appeal was not considered.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate sustained acclaim, agreeing that the recency of acclaim is required by the plain language of the Act and regulations. Awards received in 2012 or earlier with no subsequent evidence of recognition do not satisfy the 'sustained' requirement. The prior O-1 approval was non-determinative, and additional evidence submitted on appeal was not considered.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
证据为何得到认可
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met this criterion through performance in a leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner met this criterion through performance in a leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputations.