可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 5821–5830

EB-1AEB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 领导 / 关键角色

leading or critical role

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding the letters lacked the detail required to demonstrate a leading or critical role: they did not describe how the Petitioner's workshops impacted each establishment, and the Petitioner did not appear to hold a leading role in any of the organizations.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's favorable finding, concluding the letters lacked the detail required to demonstrate a leading or critical role: they did not describe how the Petitioner's workshops impacted each establishment, and the Petitioner did not appear to hold a leading role in any of the organizations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_01_B2203; source_row=35981
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

prizes or awards

AAO 为什么未被说服

The record lacked evidence that the Speaker of the Year accolades were nationally or internationally recognized: the supporting organization's information did not reference those specific accolades, the website coverage did not establish the site's national or international reputation, and the expert letter addressed a different topic without opining on the national/international recognition of the award.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record lacked evidence that the Speaker of the Year accolades were nationally or internationally recognized: the supporting organization's information did not reference those specific accolades, the website coverage did not establish the site's national or international reputation, and the expert letter addressed a different topic without opining on the national/international recognition of the award.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_01_B2203; source_row=35979
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 高薪酬未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary

AAO 为什么未被说服

The Petitioner's 2022 salary of $166,161 falls below the 90th percentile nationwide for clinical psychologists ($168,790). The salary data from Indeed (77 reported salaries) was too small a sample to be reliable, and ZipRecruiter data showed top earners in New York earn more than the Petitioner.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's 2022 salary of $166,161 falls below the 90th percentile nationwide for clinical psychologists ($168,790). The salary data from Indeed (77 reported salaries) was too small a sample to be reliable, and ZipRecruiter data showed top earners in New York earn more than the Petitioner. The Petitioner failed to provide geographically and position-appropriate compensation surveys to establish his salary is high relative to others in his specific field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_02_B2203; source_row=35986
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the business plan insufficiently detailed on job creation (no headcount estimates, unclear salary data), that the submitted policy documents showed field-level relevance rather than specific endeavor impact, and that the consulting firm would serve an inherently limited client base without demonstrated broader national implications.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found the business plan insufficiently detailed on job creation (no headcount estimates, unclear salary data), that the submitted policy documents showed field-level relevance rather than specific endeavor impact, and that the consulting firm would serve an inherently limited client base without demonstrated broader national implications. The DOL Schedule A discussion and STEM considerations did not change the analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_04_B5203; source_row=36001
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the expert letter addressed the importance of the IT field generally rather than the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor; the recommendation letters spoke to the Petitioner's qualifications rather than the national impact of his proposed company; the industry articles were general background materials; and the business plan's unsupported projections did not demonstrate how the Petitioner's company would i…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the expert letter addressed the importance of the IT field generally rather than the Petitioner's specific proposed endeavor; the recommendation letters spoke to the Petitioner's qualifications rather than the national impact of his proposed company; the industry articles were general background materials; and the business plan's unsupported projections did not demonstrate how the Petitioner's company would impact the economy or industry at a national level.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_02_B5203; source_row=35988
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

judging

证据为何得到认可

The Director found, and AAO did not disturb, that the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish participation as a judge of the work of others in the field.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found, and AAO did not disturb, that the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish participation as a judge of the work of others in the field.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_02_B2203; source_row=35984
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 学术论文作者已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 学术论文作者

scholarly articles

证据为何得到认可

The Director found, and AAO did not disturb, that the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish authorship of scholarly articles.

为什么值得参考

了解 AAO 如何判断作品是否属于学术论文,以及它在整体记录中说明什么。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director found, and AAO did not disturb, that the Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish authorship of scholarly articles.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_02_B2203; source_row=35985
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the final merits determination because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the initial evidence requirement of at least three criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_02_B2203; source_row=35987
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 媒体报道已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 媒体报道

published material

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence — including translated circulation data ranking 52 Bangladeshi newspapers and showing several publications containing articles about him had among the highest national circulation — was sufficient to satisfy the published material criterion at the initial evidence stage.…

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner's evidence — including translated circulation data ranking 52 Bangladeshi newspapers and showing several publications containing articles about him had among the highest national circulation — was sufficient to satisfy the published material criterion at the initial evidence stage. The Director's criticism that no comparative data was provided was not credible given that the document itself ranked 52 newspapers, and the publications were national rather than merely regional.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_03_B2203; source_row=35993
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 艺术展示已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 艺术展示

display of work

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the display of work criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner satisfied the display of work criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-20_03_B2203; source_row=35995
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评