可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 5961–5970

NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the third prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35778
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 基础资格申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · EB-2 基础资格

advanced degree professional qualification

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding on appeal; therefore AAO treats the issue as waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not contest the Director's finding on appeal; therefore AAO treats the issue as waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35775
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

academic record (degree/diploma)

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's technologist degree issued in Brazil in 2014 meets this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner's technologist degree issued in Brazil in 2014 meets this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35768
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)

AAO 为什么未被说服

The employer letters verified full-time status but omitted job duties. A third-party letter was insufficient to establish duties because the author lacked apparent authority to verify the Petitioner's role. The Petitioner failed to resolve this ambiguity with independent, objective evidence.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The employer letters verified full-time status but omitted job duties. A third-party letter was insufficient to establish duties because the author lacked apparent authority to verify the Petitioner's role. The Petitioner failed to resolve this ambiguity with independent, objective evidence.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35769
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field

AAO 为什么未被说服

Five peer reference letters praised the Petitioner's work performance for employers but did not describe specific achievements or contributions to the field or industry more broadly. An expert opinion letter also failed to provide specificity beyond reciting the Petitioner's credentials and quoting the reference letters.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Five peer reference letters praised the Petitioner's work performance for employers but did not describe specific achievements or contributions to the field or industry more broadly. An expert opinion letter also failed to provide specificity beyond reciting the Petitioner's credentials and quoting the reference letters.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35772
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

membership in professional associations

AAO 为什么未被说服

Two organizations had varying membership levels including student membership and the Petitioner's evidence did not establish his level of membership. A third organization was a pre-professional certifying body, not a professional association. The union membership evidence lacked specificity about the organization's purpose.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Two organizations had varying membership levels including student membership and the Petitioner's evidence did not establish his level of membership. A third organization was a pre-professional certifying body, not a professional association. The union membership evidence lacked specificity about the organization's purpose.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35771
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly reserved opinion on the second prong because the Petitioner failed to satisfy the first prong, making further analysis unnecessary.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_03_B5203; source_row=35777
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO remanded the final merits review to the Director rather than reaching it on appeal.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO remanded the final merits review to the Director rather than reaching it on appeal.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_01_B2203; source_row=35761
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 原创贡献保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 原创贡献

original contributions of major significance

裁决如何说明

Because AAO found three criteria satisfied through (iii), (iv), and (vi), it did not need to and did not reach the (v) criterion.

为什么值得参考

区分“工作具有原创性”与“原创贡献对整个领域具有重大意义”的证明。

查看完整裁决理由 +
Because AAO found three criteria satisfied through (iii), (iv), and (vi), it did not need to and did not reach the (v) criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_01_B2203; source_row=35760
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to reach prong two because the failure under prong one is dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to reach prong two because the failure under prong one is dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-02-06_04_B5203; source_row=35780
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评