The Petitioner's work experience at one employer occurred after the April 2021 filing date and thus could not be counted; other employer experience totaled under 8 years, and over 11 months was spent as an intern rather than full-time professional work, leaving the Petitioner short of the 10-year requirement.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner's work experience at one employer occurred after the April 2021 filing date and thus could not be counted; other employer experience totaled under 8 years, and over 11 months was spent as an intern rather than full-time professional work, leaving the Petitioner short of the 10-year requirement.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters of recommendation described the Petitioner's character, work ethic, and general positive qualities but did not demonstrate recognition beyond his employers and clients or show work at a level indicative of achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters of recommendation described the Petitioner's character, work ethic, and general positive qualities but did not demonstrate recognition beyond his employers and clients or show work at a level indicative of achievements and significant contributions to the industry or field.
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis. The Petitioner failed to address the Director's specific findings on appeal — including regarding the material change issue and the misapplication of experience evidence to prong one — and merely repeated broad assertions without overcoming the basis for denial.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's analysis. The Petitioner failed to address the Director's specific findings on appeal — including regarding the material change issue and the misapplication of experience evidence to prong one — and merely repeated broad assertions without overcoming the basis for denial.