ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The Petitioner submitted a letter from his accountant and business registration documents, but the accountant was not a current or former employer, and the business registration lacked sufficient detail about duties and whether work was full-time. AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion was not met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner submitted a letter from his accountant and business registration documents, but the accountant was not a current or former employer, and the business registration lacked sufficient detail about duties and whether work was full-time. AAO agreed with the Director that the criterion was not met.
AAO concluded the new W-2 evidence (showing only one employee earned over $10,000 in 2014 and a single 2016 W-2) did not show substantial positive economic effects, and the new evidence regarding magazine reputations was promotional rather than independent journalism. The expert letter focused on broad industry statistics rather than the specific endeavor.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the new W-2 evidence (showing only one employee earned over $10,000 in 2014 and a single 2016 W-2) did not show substantial positive economic effects, and the new evidence regarding magazine reputations was promotional rather than independent journalism. The expert letter focused on broad industry statistics rather than the specific endeavor.
In the underlying appeal, AAO withdrew the Director's determination on the second prong; this issue is not revisited substantively on motion since the first-prong failure is dispositive.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
In the underlying appeal, AAO withdrew the Director's determination on the second prong; this issue is not revisited substantively on motion since the first-prong failure is dispositive.
AAO reserved argument on the third prong in the prior appellate decision and does not reach it on motion because the first-prong failure remains dispositive.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved argument on the third prong in the prior appellate decision and does not reach it on motion because the first-prong failure remains dispositive.
AAO independently determined that the foreign degrees plus over five years of progressive experience qualify the Petitioner as an advanced-degree professional.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO independently determined that the foreign degrees plus over five years of progressive experience qualify the Petitioner as an advanced-degree professional.
AAO agreed the entity was not shown to be a qualifying professional association and emphasized that the Petitioner joined only after the RFE issued, which is impermissible because eligibility must be established at filing.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the entity was not shown to be a qualifying professional association and emphasized that the Petitioner joined only after the RFE issued, which is impermissible because eligibility must be established at filing.
high salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the finding because the CPA letter lacked source breakdown, the Glassdoor figures were monthly while earnings were annual, mismatched in time period, and as a business owner the Petitioner did not establish that general-manager salary was a proper comparison.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the finding because the CPA letter lacked source breakdown, the Glassdoor figures were monthly while earnings were annual, mismatched in time period, and as a business owner the Petitioner did not establish that general-manager salary was a proper comparison.
ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the letters lacked specificity as to title, duties, hours per week, and project length, and did not address time the Petitioner spent working as a pilot/aviation trainer.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding because the letters lacked specificity as to title, duties, hours per week, and project length, and did not address time the Petitioner spent working as a pilot/aviation trainer.