AAO found that the Petitioner provided sufficient evidence of having been a member of the juries for qualifying film festivals, satisfying this criterion, and accordingly withdrew the Director's determination.
为什么值得参考
了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the Petitioner provided sufficient evidence of having been a member of the juries for qualifying film festivals, satisfying this criterion, and accordingly withdrew the Director's determination.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions (criterion F)
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters of recommendation were prepared contemporaneously with the petition proceedings and described the Petitioner's routine business success without establishing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters of recommendation were prepared contemporaneously with the petition proceedings and described the Petitioner's routine business success without establishing expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the field. Business metrics cited were not shown to represent significant contributions demonstrating extraordinary expertise, and course completion certificates did not rise to the level of achievements or significant contributions.
membership in professional associations (criterion E)
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO concluded the organizations were not professional associations within the regulatory meaning. The occupation of franchisor does not appear in the list of professions requiring a bachelor's degree, and the record did not establish how the occupation of 'franchisor' relates to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as an entrepreneur in the food industry.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO concluded the organizations were not professional associations within the regulatory meaning. The occupation of franchisor does not appear in the list of professions requiring a bachelor's degree, and the record did not establish how the occupation of 'franchisor' relates to the Petitioner's proposed endeavor as an entrepreneur in the food industry.
license or certification for profession or occupation (criterion C)
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the certificates were not persuasive to demonstrate licensure or certification to perform the particular profession or occupation of entrepreneur in the food industry. The certificates did not reflect the competency to perform entrepreneurial duties in the food industry.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding, concluding the certificates were not persuasive to demonstrate licensure or certification to perform the particular profession or occupation of entrepreneur in the food industry. The certificates did not reflect the competency to perform entrepreneurial duties in the food industry.
The letters were not from current or former employers as required. The business ownership certificates lacked sufficient detail about specific duties and did not establish the field of operation, so AAO could not verify ten years of full-time experience as an entrepreneur in the food industry.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters were not from current or former employers as required. The business ownership certificates lacked sufficient detail about specific duties and did not establish the field of operation, so AAO could not verify ten years of full-time experience as an entrepreneur in the food industry.
exceptional ability under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)
裁决如何说明
AAO agreed the record does not readily establish exceptional ability but disagreed with the Director's rationale, finding the RFE notice was defective. The issue was reserved because the Dhanasar analysis is dispositive.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the record does not readily establish exceptional ability but disagreed with the Director's rationale, finding the RFE notice was defective. The issue was reserved because the Dhanasar analysis is dispositive.