AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, finding the Policy Manual provision cited by the petitioner inapplicable, and confirming that the labor certification's prohibition on alternate occupation experience and the Beneficiary's lack of documented experience in key duties (e.g., conducting time studies) meant the experience requirement was not met.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO adopted and affirmed the Director's decision, finding the Policy Manual provision cited by the petitioner inapplicable, and confirming that the labor certification's prohibition on alternate occupation experience and the Beneficiary's lack of documented experience in key duties (e.g., conducting time studies) meant the experience requirement was not met.
AAO agreed that the record established the general importance of the IT/cybersecurity industry but not the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed work. The evidence did not show the work would have broader implications beyond the employer and clients served, introduce novel technologies, contribute to development of national cybersecurity technologies or next-generation wireless networks, or generate subs…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that the record established the general importance of the IT/cybersecurity industry but not the national importance of the Petitioner's specific proposed work. The evidence did not show the work would have broader implications beyond the employer and clients served, introduce novel technologies, contribute to development of national cybersecurity technologies or next-generation wireless networks, or generate substantial positive economic effects at a national level.
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO agreed that 2023-dated financial documents reflecting 2022 income cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing, and Petitioner identified no pre-filing evidence of qualifying remuneration.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed that 2023-dated financial documents reflecting 2022 income cannot establish eligibility at the time of filing, and Petitioner identified no pre-filing evidence of qualifying remuneration.
evidence of membership in professional associations
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that criterion E was met because the Petitioner did not provide evidence of the qualifications required for membership in the organization, and therefore its professional nature was not established.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's finding that criterion E was met because the Petitioner did not provide evidence of the qualifications required for membership in the organization, and therefore its professional nature was not established.
published material about the petitioner in professional or major trade publications or other major media
AAO 为什么未被说服
While the article is about her, the record lacks evidence that the publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
While the article is about her, the record lacks evidence that the publication qualifies as a professional or major trade publication or other major media.
AAO did not address the second prong, noting only that evidence of the Petitioner's skills, knowledge, and prior work relates to the second prong but declining to analyze it given the first-prong deficiency.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not address the second prong, noting only that evidence of the Petitioner's skills, knowledge, and prior work relates to the second prong but declining to analyze it given the first-prong deficiency.