AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to substantiate how operating a single aircraft maintenance business would alleviate a national labor shortage or trigger substantial positive economic benefits at a level commensurate with national importance. The record did not show how the business would extend beyond its prospective clients to impact the industry or U.S. economy more broadly.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the Petitioner failed to substantiate how operating a single aircraft maintenance business would alleviate a national labor shortage or trigger substantial positive economic benefits at a level commensurate with national importance. The record did not show how the business would extend beyond its prospective clients to impact the industry or U.S. economy more broadly.
Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in specialty
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the submitted employment letters were deficient: the accountant's letter was not from the employer and did not describe duties; letters about teaching positions were not in the field of business administration; one employer letter did not cover the initial purchaser position; and two positions not listed on the ETA-750 could not be reconciled with the record.…
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the submitted employment letters were deficient: the accountant's letter was not from the employer and did not describe duties; letters about teaching positions were not in the field of business administration; one employer letter did not cover the initial purchaser position; and two positions not listed on the ETA-750 could not be reconciled with the record. At most, the Petitioner documented just under one year of qualifying post-baccalaureate work experience in her specialty prior to the petition filing date.
AAO declines to reach the merits of prong one because the Director's adverse finding was directly contrary to the Director's own RFE statement, denying the Petitioner a fair opportunity to address the deficiency; the matter is remanded for the Director to consider this prong in the first instance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declines to reach the merits of prong one because the Director's adverse finding was directly contrary to the Director's own RFE statement, denying the Petitioner a fair opportunity to address the deficiency; the matter is remanded for the Director to consider this prong in the first instance.
AAO declines to reach prong two, remanding to allow the Director to consider this prong in the first instance with a full opportunity for the Petitioner to respond.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declines to reach prong two, remanding to allow the Director to consider this prong in the first instance with a full opportunity for the Petitioner to respond.
AAO found the Director did not adequately address the Petitioner's rebuttal evidence or arguments disputing that the representation was false, making the finding incomplete.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director did not adequately address the Petitioner's rebuttal evidence or arguments disputing that the representation was false, making the finding incomplete.
AAO found the Director did not adequately explain how the letter in question was material to the Petitioner's eligibility, and did not evaluate the two other corroborating recommendation letters that addressed the same subject matter.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director did not adequately explain how the letter in question was material to the Petitioner's eligibility, and did not evaluate the two other corroborating recommendation letters that addressed the same subject matter.
Neither the membership card nor syndicate articles indicate licensing or certification, and the membership relates to radio broadcasting, not the Petitioner's claimed occupation as audio-video editor, filmmaker, and producer.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
Neither the membership card nor syndicate articles indicate licensing or certification, and the membership relates to radio broadcasting, not the Petitioner's claimed occupation as audio-video editor, filmmaker, and producer.