leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
证据为何得到认可
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfied the leading or critical role criterion, though this single criterion was insufficient to meet the three-criterion threshold.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner satisfied the leading or critical role criterion, though this single criterion was insufficient to meet the three-criterion threshold.
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination under Bagamasbad but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the very top of his field.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the formal final merits determination under Bagamasbad but noted in dicta that the aggregate record does not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or that the Petitioner is among the very top of his field.
AAO affirmed EB-2 eligibility on the advanced degree professional basis rather than exceptional ability, finding the foreign degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's plus six years of qualifying experience satisfies the regulatory definition.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed EB-2 eligibility on the advanced degree professional basis rather than exceptional ability, finding the foreign degree equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's plus six years of qualifying experience satisfies the regulatory definition.
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner focused on the importance of the field rather than the specific endeavor, and the business plan's projections did not show substantial positive economic effects or impact beyond prospective clients.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO affirmed that the Petitioner focused on the importance of the field rather than the specific endeavor, and the business plan's projections did not show substantial positive economic effects or impact beyond prospective clients.
ten years of full-time experience (employer letters)
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found Petitioner did not explain why employer letters were unavailable, a prerequisite for accepting comparable evidence, and the submitted evidence lacked the required detail.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found Petitioner did not explain why employer letters were unavailable, a prerequisite for accepting comparable evidence, and the submitted evidence lacked the required detail.