AAO found the Director's analysis of the second prong to be deficient for lacking any specific discussion of the Petitioner's evidence, and withdrew the decision without reaching a substantive conclusion on remand.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis of the second prong to be deficient for lacking any specific discussion of the Petitioner's evidence, and withdrew the decision without reaching a substantive conclusion on remand.
On balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO found the Director's third-prong analysis deficient for failing to identify and discuss specific evidence and for failing to address the Petitioner's specific claims, and withdrew the decision without making a substantive finding.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's third-prong analysis deficient for failing to identify and discuss specific evidence and for failing to address the Petitioner's specific claims, and withdrew the decision without making a substantive finding.
AAO found the Director's analysis fatally flawed by the erroneous characterization of the Petitioner's occupation and the failure to address the professional plan and expert opinion letter. AAO withdrew the finding and remanded without reaching a substantive conclusion.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis fatally flawed by the erroneous characterization of the Petitioner's occupation and the failure to address the professional plan and expert opinion letter. AAO withdrew the finding and remanded without reaching a substantive conclusion.
AAO previously affirmed that the Petitioner did not establish national importance of his IT consulting business, and in the current motion the Petitioner failed to identify specific evidence of national importance or any legal error that would warrant reconsideration.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously affirmed that the Petitioner did not establish national importance of his IT consulting business, and in the current motion the Petitioner failed to identify specific evidence of national importance or any legal error that would warrant reconsideration.
AAO withdrew the Director's prong-one finding because the Director provided no analysis or discussion of the evidence. AAO further noted that the relevant question for national importance is the specific proposed endeavor, not the importance of the industry generally; the reach of the Petitioner's endeavor appears limited to passengers and students he may serve as a pilot or aviation instructor.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO withdrew the Director's prong-one finding because the Director provided no analysis or discussion of the evidence. AAO further noted that the relevant question for national importance is the specific proposed endeavor, not the importance of the industry generally; the reach of the Petitioner's endeavor appears limited to passengers and students he may serve as a pilot or aviation instructor.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion conclusory and insufficient, as the Director listed some awards but did not discuss the specific evidence submitted, including accompanying letters and other supporting evidence. AAO remanded for re-examination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis of this criterion conclusory and insufficient, as the Director listed some awards but did not discuss the specific evidence submitted, including accompanying letters and other supporting evidence. AAO remanded for re-examination.
published material about the individual and their work
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found the Director's analysis incomplete, as the Director failed to reference any of the 20 articles submitted and ignored record evidence of major media publication. AAO remanded for re-examination.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis incomplete, as the Director failed to reference any of the 20 articles submitted and ignored record evidence of major media publication. AAO remanded for re-examination.
The new professional plan's addition of a job creation estimate (up to 15 jobs) and pricing details is insufficient to establish national importance because the Petitioner has not demonstrated that the job creation will result in broad impact commensurate with national importance, and the assertions are unsupported by relevant, probative, and credible evidence.…
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The new professional plan's addition of a job creation estimate (up to 15 jobs) and pricing details is insufficient to establish national importance because the Petitioner has not demonstrated that the job creation will result in broad impact commensurate with national importance, and the assertions are unsupported by relevant, probative, and credible evidence. The pricing information is more relevant to prong two than prong one.