获批画像 AAO 裁决 可追溯来源的裁决研究
检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。 从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。
本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。
10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定
当前显示 6381–6390
NIW EB-1A · 最终综合评估 保留不审 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
EB-1A · 最终综合评估 final merits determination (exceptional ability)
裁决如何说明
Because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three evidentiary criteria, AAO did not conduct a formal final merits analysis, though it noted the record in aggregate does not support finding exceptional ability.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 + Because the Petitioner failed to meet at least three evidentiary criteria, AAO did not conduct a formal final merits analysis, though it noted the record in aggregate does not support finding exceptional ability. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_06_B5203; source_row=35148 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW EB-1A · 高薪酬 申请人未主张 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
EB-1A · 高薪酬 commanding a salary demonstrating exceptional ability
裁决如何说明
The Petitioner did not address or contest on appeal the Director's finding regarding criterion D, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 + The Petitioner did not address or contest on appeal the Director's finding regarding criterion D, so AAO deemed the issue waived. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_06_B5203; source_row=35145 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW recognition 申请人未主张 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
recognition recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the field
裁决如何说明
The Petitioner did not address or contest on appeal the Director's finding regarding criterion F, so AAO deemed the issue waived.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 + The Petitioner did not address or contest on appeal the Director's finding regarding criterion F, so AAO deemed the issue waived. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_06_B5203; source_row=35147 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW ten years experience 未满足 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
ten years experience at least ten years of full-time experience
AAO 为什么未被说服
AAO found that the employment letters do not indicate full-time work, the Petitioner appeared to work for two employers simultaneously (suggesting neither was full-time), and the contracts and social security documents do not come from employers and do not confirm full-time capacity.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 + AAO found that the employment letters do not indicate full-time work, the Petitioner appeared to work for two employers simultaneously (suggesting neither was full-time), and the contracts and social security documents do not come from employers and do not confirm full-time capacity. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_06_B5203; source_row=35143 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW academic record 已满足 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
academic record official academic record (degree/diploma/certificate)
证据为何得到认可
AAO found that the diploma and academic transcripts demonstrating completion of the nursing technician qualification course satisfy this criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 + AAO found that the diploma and academic transcripts demonstrating completion of the nursing technician qualification course satisfy this criterion. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_06_B5203; source_row=35142 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW NIW · 综合权衡 保留不审 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
NIW · 综合权衡 on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO declined to reach the third prong, reserving it as unnecessary because the first prong was dispositive.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 + AAO declined to reach the third prong, reserving it as unnecessary because the first prong was dispositive. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_07_B5203; source_row=35155 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW NIW · 有能力推进事业 保留不审 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
NIW · 有能力推进事业 well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
裁决如何说明
AAO declined to reach the second prong, reserving it as unnecessary because the first prong was dispositive.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 + AAO declined to reach the second prong, reserving it as unnecessary because the first prong was dispositive. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_07_B5203; source_row=35154 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW NIW · 国家重要性 申请人未主张 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
NIW · 国家重要性 substantial merit and national importance
裁决如何说明
AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner did not address prong one on motion, meaning the Director's adverse finding remained unchallenged.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 + AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner did not address prong one on motion, meaning the Director's adverse finding remained unchallenged. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_02_B5203; source_row=35130 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW NIW · 有能力推进事业 未审查 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
NIW · 有能力推进事业 well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor
裁决如何说明
AAO did not evaluate this prong on the merits because the motion was dismissed on procedural grounds; the footnote reference is purely illustrative of the motion's inadequacy.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 + AAO did not evaluate this prong on the merits because the motion was dismissed on procedural grounds; the footnote reference is purely illustrative of the motion's inadequacy. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_02_B5203; source_row=35131 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ NIW NIW · 综合权衡 申请人未主张 自动提取 · 分类可能不完整
2023年12月20日 审查的问题
NIW · 综合权衡 on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner did not address prong three on motion, meaning the Director's adverse finding remained unchallenged.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 + AAO noted in a footnote that the Petitioner did not address prong three on motion, meaning the Director's adverse finding remained unchallenged. 精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-12-20_02_B5203; source_row=35132 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗ ← 上一页 639 下一页 → ← 返回测评