AAO found the documents do not indicate whether the Petitioner worked in a full-time capacity and do not describe job duties, so the evidence fails to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the documents do not indicate whether the Petitioner worked in a full-time capacity and do not describe job duties, so the evidence fails to demonstrate ten years of full-time experience.
AAO found the certificates submitted do not clearly qualify as 'official academic records' from a 'college, university, school, or other institution of learning' because the record lacks evidence about the nature of the issuing parties.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the certificates submitted do not clearly qualify as 'official academic records' from a 'college, university, school, or other institution of learning' because the record lacks evidence about the nature of the issuing parties.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
裁决如何说明
AAO reserved judgment on criterion (F) because the record already fails to satisfy at least two other criteria, making it unnecessary to determine whether criterion (F) is met in order to resolve the three-criterion threshold.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved judgment on criterion (F) because the record already fails to satisfy at least two other criteria, making it unnecessary to determine whether criterion (F) is met in order to resolve the three-criterion threshold.
AAO agreed with the Director that the endeavor has substantial merit, but found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. Projected revenues and indirect jobs did not show significant national economic impact, identified geographic areas were unspecified, and the businesses lacked demonstrated scale for national-level social impact or field-wide advancement.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed with the Director that the endeavor has substantial merit, but found the Petitioner failed to demonstrate national importance. Projected revenues and indirect jobs did not show significant national economic impact, identified geographic areas were unspecified, and the businesses lacked demonstrated scale for national-level social impact or field-wide advancement.
AAO found the Petitioner conflated the importance of the hospice industry with the importance of the Beneficiary's specific endeavor. The record lacked evidence of plans for publication, presentation, or distribution of the Beneficiary's work, and the expert letter made only vague general statements without explaining how the Beneficiary's specific work would affect governmental programs, agencies, or the national economy.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner conflated the importance of the hospice industry with the importance of the Beneficiary's specific endeavor. The record lacked evidence of plans for publication, presentation, or distribution of the Beneficiary's work, and the expert letter made only vague general statements without explaining how the Beneficiary's specific work would affect governmental programs, agencies, or the national economy.
AAO previously found the Petitioner did not show how his endeavor would have broader implications in the field or significant positive economic effects, and this motion did not demonstrate any error in that finding.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO previously found the Petitioner did not show how his endeavor would have broader implications in the field or significant positive economic effects, and this motion did not demonstrate any error in that finding.
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate how her endeavor would have broader implications in the field or significant potential to employ U.S. workers or other substantial positive economic effects. The new job offer letter as an online interpreter similarly failed to show broader national implications beyond the individual customers she would serve.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner did not demonstrate how her endeavor would have broader implications in the field or significant potential to employ U.S. workers or other substantial positive economic effects. The new job offer letter as an online interpreter similarly failed to show broader national implications beyond the individual customers she would serve.