可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 6621–6630

NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

经济学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found no evidence of national importance: the consultancy is a lone business venture with no plan or data showing broader economic impact, job creation, or operation in an economically depressed area.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the endeavor has substantial merit but found no evidence of national importance: the consultancy is a lone business venture with no plan or data showing broader economic impact, job creation, or operation in an economically depressed area.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_05_B5203; source_row=34730
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWacademic record已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

academic record

official academic record

证据为何得到认可

The record shows the Petitioner has earned an associate's degree and a certificate related to his claimed area of exceptional ability, satisfying this criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The record shows the Petitioner has earned an associate's degree and a certificate related to his claimed area of exceptional ability, satisfying this criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=34718
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWrecognition未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

recognition

recognition for achievements and significant contributions

AAO 为什么未被说服

The letters from colleagues discuss the Petitioner's project successes but do not reference formal recognition of achievements or contributions to the IT industry from peers, government entities, or professional or business organizations.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters from colleagues discuss the Petitioner's project successes but do not reference formal recognition of achievements or contributions to the IT industry from peers, government entities, or professional or business organizations.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=34723
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 高薪酬申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

EB-1A · 高薪酬

high salary or remuneration

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not claim to meet this criterion and submitted no documentation of salary or remuneration; AAO deemed the issue waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not claim to meet this criterion and submitted no documentation of salary or remuneration; AAO deemed the issue waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=34721
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWlicense or certification申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

license or certification

license or certification

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not claim to meet this criterion and the record includes no relevant licenses or certifications; AAO deemed the issue waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not claim to meet this criterion and the record includes no relevant licenses or certifications; AAO deemed the issue waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=34720
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWten years experience已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

ten years experience

ten years of full-time experience

证据为何得到认可

AAO found that a signed statement by the Petitioner as company owner, corroborated by signed letters from management at client companies attesting to full-time work spanning over ten years, along with invoices and other evidence, satisfied the criterion.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that a signed statement by the Petitioner as company owner, corroborated by signed letters from management at client companies attesting to full-time work spanning over ten years, along with invoices and other evidence, satisfied the criterion.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_03_B5203; source_row=34719
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other申请人未主张自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

exceptional ability in sciences, arts, or business

裁决如何说明

The Petitioner did not raise or contest the exceptional ability claim on appeal; AAO deemed it waived.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Petitioner did not raise or contest the exceptional ability claim on appeal; AAO deemed it waived.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_10_B5203; source_row=34753
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

商业 / 管理

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found that the purported signatures on the 'proposed endeavor statement' and 'updated personal statement' appeared to be pixelated, copied images, casting doubt on the reliability and sufficiency of those documents and the record overall.…

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the purported signatures on the 'proposed endeavor statement' and 'updated personal statement' appeared to be pixelated, copied images, casting doubt on the reliability and sufficiency of those documents and the record overall. Even apart from the reliability concerns, the generalized hotel industry statistics were immaterial because they did not discuss the specific proposed endeavor, and the record lacked concrete evidence of operational plans (location, employees, wages) that could demonstrate broader national implications.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_06_B5203; source_row=34733
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 专业协会会员未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 专业协会会员

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found descriptions of selection criteria too nebulous and that merely repeating regulatory language does not satisfy the burden of proof. The evidence did not show how the Petitioner's specific achievements were considered or determined to be outstanding.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found descriptions of selection criteria too nebulous and that merely repeating regulatory language does not satisfy the burden of proof. The evidence did not show how the Petitioner's specific achievements were considered or determined to be outstanding.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_01_B2203; source_row=34710
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未审查自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

社会科学

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

substantial merit and national importance

裁决如何说明

The Director did not discuss either the substantial merit or the national importance of the Petitioner's actual endeavor to provide legal consultancy services; remand is required for proper analysis.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director did not discuss either the substantial merit or the national importance of the Petitioner's actual endeavor to provide legal consultancy services; remand is required for proper analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-29_04_B5203; source_row=34727
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评