The Director did not discuss any evidence specific to the actual record when concluding the Petitioner did not meet the second prong; remand is required.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director did not discuss any evidence specific to the actual record when concluding the Petitioner did not meet the second prong; remand is required.
on balance, beneficial to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
The Director did not discuss any evidence specific to the actual record when concluding the Petitioner did not meet the third prong; remand is required for proper analysis.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The Director did not discuss any evidence specific to the actual record when concluding the Petitioner did not meet the third prong; remand is required for proper analysis.
on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement
裁决如何说明
AAO did not separately address prong three, adopting and affirming the Director's decision wholesale; the appeal was dismissed on the national importance issue.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately address prong three, adopting and affirming the Director's decision wholesale; the appeal was dismissed on the national importance issue.
AAO did not separately address prong two, adopting and affirming the Director's decision wholesale; the appeal was dismissed on the national importance issue.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not separately address prong two, adopting and affirming the Director's decision wholesale; the appeal was dismissed on the national importance issue.
The record includes a regulatory-prescribed letter from the Petitioner's former employer attesting to his ten years of full-time experience in multiple industrial and management positions, satisfying the criterion.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The record includes a regulatory-prescribed letter from the Petitioner's former employer attesting to his ten years of full-time experience in multiple industrial and management positions, satisfying the criterion.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
AAO 为什么未被说服
The letters from managers at the Petitioner's previous employer discussed his professionalism and skills but did not reference any recognition of achievements within or contributions to the automotive industry or industrial management field. There is no documentation of any impact of his work in either domain.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
The letters from managers at the Petitioner's previous employer discussed his professionalism and skills but did not reference any recognition of achievements within or contributions to the automotive industry or industrial management field. There is no documentation of any impact of his work in either domain.
AAO found the Director's analysis misplaced because the final-merits-type assessment is inappropriate at the criterion-satisfaction stage. Because the Petitioner submitted an official academic record showing a diploma from an institution of learning related to his claimed area of exceptional ability, the criterion is satisfied.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director's analysis misplaced because the final-merits-type assessment is inappropriate at the criterion-satisfaction stage. Because the Petitioner submitted an official academic record showing a diploma from an institution of learning related to his claimed area of exceptional ability, the criterion is satisfied.
AAO found that the evidence addressed the importance of the aquaculture industry generally but did not show how the Petitioner's specific consulting endeavor would have national-level impact. The projected 15 in-house jobs and business financials lacked probative support, and the Petitioner failed to show substantial positive economic effects beyond his own employees and clients.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found that the evidence addressed the importance of the aquaculture industry generally but did not show how the Petitioner's specific consulting endeavor would have national-level impact. The projected 15 in-house jobs and business financials lacked probative support, and the Petitioner failed to show substantial positive economic effects beyond his own employees and clients.
exceptional ability (three of six criteria and final merits)
裁决如何说明
AAO declines to reach the exceptional ability determination because the NIW analysis is dispositive and no finding is needed on the underlying EB-2 classification.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declines to reach the exceptional ability determination because the NIW analysis is dispositive and no finding is needed on the underlying EB-2 classification.