License to practice the profession or certification for a particular profession or occupation
证据为何得到认可
AAO found the Director overlooked credible certification evidence; the record satisfies this criterion because the Petitioner holds a certification for his particular occupation.
为什么值得参考
利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Director overlooked credible certification evidence; the record satisfies this criterion because the Petitioner holds a certification for his particular occupation.
AAO did not reach the second prong but criticized the Director for repeating prong-one analysis, ignoring credentials and supporting evidence, and applying heightened standards (e.g., requiring 'significant contribution' or 'impetus for progress') beyond the scope of the second prong.
为什么值得参考
识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣，以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the second prong but criticized the Director for repeating prong-one analysis, ignoring credentials and supporting evidence, and applying heightened standards (e.g., requiring 'significant contribution' or 'impetus for progress') beyond the scope of the second prong.
AAO did not reach the first prong but found that the Director's analysis was inadequate, consisting of boilerplate and a conclusory finding that did not address the petitioner's business plan or evidence of economic effects, societal welfare, and matters of governmentally recognized national importance.
为什么值得参考
对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the first prong but found that the Director's analysis was inadequate, consisting of boilerplate and a conclusory finding that did not address the petitioner's business plan or evidence of economic effects, societal welfare, and matters of governmentally recognized national importance.
AAO did not reach the third prong but faulted the Director for stating the law without identifying or discussing the evidence weighed or addressing the Petitioner's specific claims.
为什么值得参考
理解除了希望自我申请之外，哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。
查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the third prong but faulted the Director for stating the law without identifying or discussing the evidence weighed or addressing the Petitioner's specific claims.