可追溯来源的裁决研究

检索 AAO 如何审视申请证据。

从大量个案裁决理由中检索,再按申请类别、领域、法律问题或日期缩小范围。

本扩展案例库优先提供有来源依据的记录,而不以自动分类是否完美作为展示门槛。字段、标签、摘要和相关性可能有误;标为“分类可能不完整”的记录需格外谨慎。依赖任何记录前请核对所列来源。这些上诉与动议不代表获批概率或拒绝率,也不构成法律意见或个案预测。来源原文保留英文。

清除筛选

10,847 份裁决 / 36,849 项裁决认定

当前显示 6811–6820

NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

计算机科学 / 人工智能

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved the second prong as the first prong determination is dispositive. AAO noted that the Petitioner's experience and knowledge is relevant to whether he is well-positioned to advance the endeavor, not to national importance.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved the second prong as the first prong determination is dispositive. AAO noted that the Petitioner's experience and knowledge is relevant to whether he is well-positioned to advance the endeavor, not to national importance.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_05_B5203; source_row=34474
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 综合权衡保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 综合权衡

on balance, beneficial to waive job offer requirement

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because prong one was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

理解除了希望自我申请之外,哪些与具体事业相关的事实会影响豁免分析。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong three because prong one was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_01_B5203; source_row=34448
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

裁决如何说明

AAO explicitly declined to reach prong two because prong one was dispositive.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO explicitly declined to reach prong two because prong one was dispositive.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_01_B5203; source_row=34447
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 国家重要性未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

NIW · 国家重要性

Substantial merit and national importance

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner's proposed work as an aviation mechanic for a specific employer would not extend beyond that employer to impact the aviation field or U.S. economy at a national level. The record did not show projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to the Petitioner's work, and claimed benefits would not reach the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' under Dhanasar.

为什么值得参考

对照裁决如何区分“领域整体重要”与“申请人具体工作将产生的未来影响”。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner's proposed work as an aviation mechanic for a specific employer would not extend beyond that employer to impact the aviation field or U.S. economy at a national level. The record did not show projected U.S. economic impact or job creation attributable to the Petitioner's work, and claimed benefits would not reach the level of 'substantial positive economic effects' under Dhanasar.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_04_B5203; source_row=34470
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWEB-1A · 最终综合评估未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

Final merits determination — expertise significantly above ordinary

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO found the Petitioner did not show how their degree, experience, certifications, licenses, and memberships distinguished them from other aviation mechanics. The 'First Technician' title lacked a demonstrated basis for the award, salary comparisons were unsupported, and recommendation letters confirmed employment and praised skills without establishing expertise significantly above ordinary levels.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO found the Petitioner did not show how their degree, experience, certifications, licenses, and memberships distinguished them from other aviation mechanics. The 'First Technician' title lacked a demonstrated basis for the award, salary comparisons were unsupported, and recommendation letters confirmed employment and praised skills without establishing expertise significantly above ordinary levels.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_04_B5203; source_row=34469
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWexceptional ability other已满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

exceptional ability other

Initial criteria threshold (at least 3 of 6)

证据为何得到认可

AAO agreed the Petitioner met at least three of the six required criteria.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the Petitioner met at least three of the six required criteria.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_04_B5203; source_row=34468
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 最终综合评估保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 最终综合评估

final merits determination

裁决如何说明

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the initial evidence threshold. In dicta, AAO noted the record in the aggregate does not support sustained national or international acclaim.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the Petitioner failed the initial evidence threshold. In dicta, AAO noted the record in the aggregate does not support sustained national or international acclaim.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_02_B2203; source_row=34455
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 评审保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 评审

participation as a judge of the work of others

裁决如何说明

AAO reserved analysis of criterion iv because failure on five other criteria already meant the Petitioner could not meet the threshold of three criteria, making detailed discussion of this criterion unnecessary to the outcome.

为什么值得参考

了解评审邀请、已完成任务及评审性质如何被记录和衡量。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO reserved analysis of criterion iv because failure on five other criteria already meant the Petitioner could not meet the threshold of three criteria, making detailed discussion of this criterion unnecessary to the outcome.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_02_B2203; source_row=34453
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
NIWNIW · 有能力推进事业未满足自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

机械 / 制造工程

审查的问题

NIW · 有能力推进事业

well-positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

AAO 为什么未被说服

AAO agreed the submitted documentation is insufficient to meet this prong, noting the patent had not been shown to be granted, successfully commercialized, or to have drawn investor or customer interest, but faulted the Director for not analyzing all relevant evidence and adequately explaining its deficiencies.

为什么值得参考

识别 AAO 期待看到的已有进展、资源、外部兴趣,以及过去经历与未来计划之间的连接。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO agreed the submitted documentation is insufficient to meet this prong, noting the patent had not been shown to be granted, successfully commercialized, or to have drawn investor or customer interest, but faulted the Director for not analyzing all relevant evidence and adequately explaining its deficiencies.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_02_B5203; source_row=34457
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · 奖项保留不审自动提取 · 分类可能不完整

案件事实

其他

审查的问题

EB-1A · 奖项

awards

裁决如何说明

AAO did not reach the merits of this criterion, remanding for the Director to reevaluate with a properly detailed analysis.

为什么值得参考

利用裁决理由识别 AAO 认为重要的具体事实或文件缺口。

查看完整裁决理由 +
AAO did not reach the merits of this criterion, remanding for the Director to reevaluate with a properly detailed analysis.
精确记录定位: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2023-11-15_01_B2203; source_row=34442
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
打开来源数据集 ↗
← 返回测评